On July 1, Allen Johnson, editorial page editor for the News & Record, reported on his participation in a gathering in Canada and, in my opinion, misrepresented the reactions of our City Council members to the Truth and Reconciliation report. I believe Johnson and the News & Record have been the main supporters of what I would dub the Half Truth and Condemnation report.
Johnson apparently told this gathering that the council did nothing regarding the report. In fact, a majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion. A decision not to engage in further discussion is a decision, whether Mr. Johnson agreed with it or not. And I don't recall a major negative reaction from the public regarding this position.
While I am sure Johnson and the News & Record, as well as a number of council people, disagreed with this position, he misstated the facts and should be ashamed for portraying Greensboro in this manner. While I don't expect an apology, the people of Greensboro should wonder about Mr. Johnson's objectivity.
John A. Mullins Jr.
Greensboro


Comments (4)
Hurray!!!
A majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion . . .
this was one of the BEST things they ever did . . .
Posted by J Peterman Reality Tour
|
July 12, 2007 5:51 AM
I'd rather the City Council get on with the business of 2007 instead of sitting around talking about something that happened 30 years ago.
Posted by nitpicker
|
July 12, 2007 8:54 AM
What say ye, Mr. Johnson?
Posted by hugh
|
July 12, 2007 8:58 AM
"a majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion."
Really? When did this happen? I know that several Councilmembers commented on the recommendations section of the report, but did a majority actually read it, much less review and comment on it?
Posted by Ed Cone
|
July 12, 2007 10:17 AM