News & Record, Greensboro, NC
,
°
Humidity: %
Wind: mph,
Market Place
TriadCareers TriadCars TriadHomes Triad Marketplace Business Directory Classifieds Newspaper Ads Featured Job Ads Archives Apartments Celebrations Obituaries Place an Ad Personals Print Advertising Ad Post Online Advertising N&R Store
ADVERTISEMENT
Special Sections
test
Letters to the Editor
Thursday, July 12, 2007

« 'Dropout factories' can be improved | Main | Physicians as terrorists overturn medical ethics »

The City Council decided not to extend discussion

On July 1, Allen Johnson, editorial page editor for the News & Record, reported on his participation in a gathering in Canada and, in my opinion, misrepresented the reactions of our City Council members to the Truth and Reconciliation report. I believe Johnson and the News & Record have been the main supporters of what I would dub the Half Truth and Condemnation report.

Johnson apparently told this gathering that the council did nothing regarding the report. In fact, a majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion. A decision not to engage in further discussion is a decision, whether Mr. Johnson agreed with it or not. And I don't recall a major negative reaction from the public regarding this position.

While I am sure Johnson and the News & Record, as well as a number of council people, disagreed with this position, he misstated the facts and should be ashamed for portraying Greensboro in this manner. While I don't expect an apology, the people of Greensboro should wonder about Mr. Johnson's objectivity.

John A. Mullins Jr.
Greensboro

Comments (4)

Hurray!!!

A majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion . . .

this was one of the BEST things they ever did . . .

I'd rather the City Council get on with the business of 2007 instead of sitting around talking about something that happened 30 years ago.

What say ye, Mr. Johnson?

"a majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion."

Really? When did this happen? I know that several Councilmembers commented on the recommendations section of the report, but did a majority actually read it, much less review and comment on it?

Post a comment

Contact Us | About Us | News & Record Jobs | Terms of Use | Subscribe | Help
Print Advertising | Online Advertising | © 2004 News & Record
Subscription Services, Manage your subscription, Create a subscription

ADVERTISEMENT