The following is a Counterpoint:
By Richard A. Koritz
On Aug. 22, I drove to Raleigh to attend my first meeting as a member of the North Carolina Human Relations Commission.
The News & Record for Aug. 22 had featured front-page headline coverage of the victory of City Councilwoman T. Dianne Bellamy-Small in the recall vote held on Aug. 21. An editorial that morning also focused on this rare occurrence, concluding that the only thing this community achieved with the election was a bill for $15,000. I strongly disagree.
When asked to comment on happenings on the human relations front in Greensboro, I gave the following reply to my new colleagues:
The vote signified that the majority black district which the councilwoman serves is not going to let other folks, especially well-connected white folks, tell the black community who should be their representative. This is a very positive outcome.
Greensboro has district council seats precisely as a means to remedy the situation in which African American representation had been systematically denied. From the time when Councilwoman Florence Gatten, whatever her personal motivation, first publicly called for Bellamy-Small to resign her elected council seat -- and throughout the lengthy process of the petition effort which compelled the recall referendum -- I have been alarmed that this series of events represented a return to the open white-supremacist oppression of the period prior to the 1960s, prior to the emergence of the civil rights movement.
I applaud Bellamy-Small for standing firm against the campaign to get her to resign or to become demoralized and lose the recall vote. Had either of these things occurred, it would have been a serious defeat for the black community and all of us who believe in justice and fairness.
As a voter in District 1, I have not been happy with Bellamy-Small's representation. Her lack of support for the A&T homecoming vendors and lack of interest thus far in the effort which I help lead to bring truth to our community youth regarding military recruitment in our high schools have been troubling.
However, in defending herself and her elected position, Bellamy-Small has led a successful defense of the black community on the political front.
Those of us who rallied to her side against the recall effort also were standing up for equality. And we prevailed. Congratulations (and watchfulness) are in order.
The writer lives in Greensboro.


Comments (13)
Mr. Kortz,
So, you have not been happy with her performance as your representative, and it appears that no consideration was given to the issues that prompted the recall. As I read your letter, those of you that rallied to her side did so solely because of her race. You are not letting well-connected white folks push you around, and no going back to the white-supremacist oppression of the period prior to the 1960s, huh? Interesting.
Posted by Oak Ridge Runner
|
August 30, 2007 5:09 AM
As I read this letter, it dawned on me that the only thing thid writer saw was race. Regretfully- not everything is about race and until minorities stop playing this 'card' there will be no advancement.
The recall had to do with Small's poor performance. Perhaps district 1 doesn't care about right or wrong--only race. It seems ironic to me that only whit people are considered racist.
Posted by gaytony
|
August 30, 2007 7:18 AM
Mr. Koritz,
Wanna know how to spot a racist? Look in the mirror!
Posted by Bishop
|
August 30, 2007 7:41 AM
The recall vote established that District 1 voters prefer their elected officials to intimidate law enforcement and to violate the public trust by leaking "classified" documents to the press.
They get what they vote for.
Posted by hugh
|
August 30, 2007 9:23 AM
And this guy is a/the representative to the Human Relations Commission?
Has anyone heard any rumblings about misdeeds on both sides of the recall election?
ORR & gaytony, excellent points! I must say that I am in agreement!
Shalom
Posted by Darryl
|
August 30, 2007 9:49 AM
Agreed as well. Odd group today, huh?
Posted by Mick
|
August 30, 2007 9:54 AM
Hey, Richard Koritz, how about you and Diane B-S and all the supporters of D. B-S tell the Greensboro Police to keep their officers out of district 1. That way the police do not have to worry about intimadation from those that truly believe that as long as their representative can do it, they can, too.
I like to follow the examples of my public leaders. They are always right. Ain't they? The Dog's outa here.
Crime Dog
Posted by Crime Dog
|
August 30, 2007 10:34 AM
Gaytony, I think that what Mr. Koritz is saying is do not presume to tell African American voters what is in their best interest. How could you? And as far as your statement about "minorities playing the race card....and there being no advancement," that's incredibly arrogant of you. The last time that I looked, the black middle class had grown, there were more black college graduates, more elected black officials and at least one black presidential candidate. The tone of your reply is exactly what the majority of District 1 voters rebelled against. And also, blacks didn't invent the "race card." I would imagine that 244 years of slavery, Reconstruction and Jim Crow gave birth to that little bundle of putrid joy.
Posted by conundrum
|
August 30, 2007 10:38 AM
I must have missed the part where someone presumed to 'tell African American voters what is in their best interest'. The only thing I saw was that many people (I don't know their race, do you?) signed a petition to have DBS recalled.
The voters who turned out decided that they did not want DBS recalled, after all.
What I find interesting is the only use of the word 'black' was by conundrum and then it was used 5 times along with the description 'African-American' thrown in for good measure.
My guess is that more than one minister/power broker whipped up his congregation to head to the polls to not let whitey "tell African American voters what is in their best interest".
My guess is that most folks who voted to keep her in office either do not understand the fool she has made of herself and her office or don't care because the color of her skin matches there's. At least that's the impression I've got from reading the words of her supporters.
Personally, I think any churches whose ministers have defended her or urged their constituents to do so should IMMEDIATELY lose their tax-exempt status.
Posted by nitpicker
|
August 30, 2007 11:19 AM
nit, if it is done from the pulpit I am in total agreement with you.
I have heard rumblings of things. I wonder what the outcome will be?
Stay tuned; same race card time, same race card place!
Shalom
Posted by Darryl
|
August 30, 2007 1:48 PM
It's disappointing that Mr. Koritz can't give one single reason beyond racial solidarity for supporting the councilwoman.
While I strongly opposed the recall effort for District 1, I would support a recall of Mr. Koritz from the NC Human Relations Commission. No one, of any race, who bases his or her vote on how it will advance one particular racial or ethnic group deserves a place on the commission.
Posted by Dave Ribar
|
August 30, 2007 2:02 PM
Yes! Weekly has some info.
Posted by Mick
|
August 30, 2007 2:28 PM
"It's disappointing that Mr. Koritz can't give one single reason beyond racial solidarity for supporting the councilwoman."
Just standard operating procedure for those who us "racism" as a bludgeon to support their political/social/economic views, regardless of the facts of the situation.
Posted by Bubba
|
August 30, 2007 9:48 PM