How much throw could a last throe throw if a last throe could throw last?*
Reporters are criticized, often accurately, for being obnoxious pains in the rear end. But, as this transcript shows, sometimes it's because they've been provoked by a, well, less-than-fully-forthcoming government official, in which case this approach on the reporter's part is no more or less than doing the job correctly.
Totally unsolicited public-relations hint: If what you mean is "no comment," then say "no comment." Seriously. Both journalists and the public will appreciate the time you're saving them and the fact that you're not actively trying to insult their intelligence, even if they won't be satisfied with the answer.
*Theme of the headline was my idea, but kudos to my podmate Dick Barron for coming up with a version that scans correctly.
Comments (2)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
It's about darned time that someone from the media said, "Give 'We the People' a straight answer!" (See Crooks & Liars)
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/06/16.html#a3481
Posted on June 17, 2005 1:47 PM
"Is there any idea how long a 'last throe' lasts for?"
Great question.
I wonder if McClellan cries himself to sleep at night.
Posted on June 17, 2005 1:48 PM