News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Off the Record

« Ham's slam | Main | Not a constitutional case ... yet »

A friend of Jesse's is no friend of Ted's

Teddy Kennedy and Patrick Leahy roughed up Terrence Boyle a bit in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing the other day.

No surprise: The New England liberals regard Boyle, a North Carolina Republican nominated by President Bush for a seat on the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, as an extreme right-winger.

Want proof? Horrors! Boyle worked briefly as a legislative assistant for Jesse Helms 32 years ago. ...

The Democrats are taking their cue from the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, which is opposing Boyle's confirmation. Here's what Wade Henderson, LCCR executive director, had to say about Boyle, according to the Charlotte Observer:

"This is a judge committed to the Old South, a friend of Jesse Helms, who helped keep black judges off the 4th Circuit."

That's a smear job.

Committed to the Old South? Is Boyle a proponent of slavery, or just the Jim Crow era? Does he belong to the Klan? Has he lynched anyone?

Well, he's a "friend" of Jesse Helms - and it was Helms who helped keep black judges off the 4th Circuit.

What Helms did - blocking Bill Clinton's nominees to the appeals court - was his typical obstructionism. Whether he blocked qualified judges such as James Beaty and James Wynn because they're black or simply because Clinton nominated them, I don't know. But Terrence Boyle didn't have anything to do with it. Using him to get back at Helms is foolish.

But what about the judge himself? The Observer reported that North Carolina civil rights groups oppose Boyle, who's been a federal district judge for more than 20 years. But the Observer added:

"Other traditional allies of the Democratic Party, including liberal trial lawyers and environmental groups, give Boyle glowing reviews.

"Wade Smith, a Raleigh trial lawyer who chaired the state Democratic Party in the mid-1980s, said Boyle was fair.

"'He sits squarely in the middle and holds the government's feet to the fire, making sure they do what the law requires,' Smith said. 'I can be (representing) a communist or the common people, the poorest of the poor, and he's always fair.'"

But Leahy portrayed Boyle as out of the mainstream, asserting that Boyle's rulings have been reversed on appeal 12 percent of the time, a high mark. Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham, however, challenged Leahy on the facts, citing a reversal rate of 7.5 percent - below the national average of 9.7 percent.

I think Boyle, rated as "well qualified" by the American Bar Association, probably is conservative. And he ought to be. In effect, he'll be representing North Carolina on the 4th Circuit court, and North Carolina twice has voted strongly for Bush. In my view, that entitles Bush to place the judges of his choice on the federal bench, provided the MAJORITY of senators concurs. Fortunately, Ted Kennedy and Pat Leahy don't represent majority opinion in the Senate, and their judgments sure don't hold much sway in North Carolina.

Unfortunately, Senate Democrats have taken to filibustering judicial nominees they don't like. Whether they'll use that tactic against Boyle isn't known yet. If they do, it will take 60 votes to break the filibuster and confirm him. I'd guess there would be enough moderate Dems willing to support Boyle, whom Bush first nominated in 2001 but was blocked from even getting a confirmation hearing by John Edwards - Helms style.

Addendum: Bush has appointed two black judges to the 4th Circuit court: Allyson Duncan of North Carolina, a Republican; and Roger Gregory of Virginia, a Democrat.

Comments (5)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Joe Guarino said:

Pat Leahy is increasingly an anachronism, a throwback, an irrelevancy. The national party he serves is centered on unrestricted access to legal abortion on demand, but the American public is moving away from this position. While he has a gentle manner, he has been arguably the most bitterly partisan, divisive United States Senator because he relishes using the judicial confirmation process to enforce a certain ideological perspective in the federal courts.

When Mr. Leahy had his brief encounter with Vice President Cheney last year, he experienced firsthand the Christian concept of grace. That is, like all of us, he found that he got far better than what he deserves.

It will be interesting to see whether the Republicans will deploy the so-called nuclear option; and if they do, what it will mean for the future of the filibuster process overall in the US Senate.

What would have been interesting would have been for Bush to nominate two black judges to the r4h circuit court while Helms was still in the Senate.

Doug said:

Patrick,

Interestingly, Bush nominated a third African American to the 4th Circuit court in 2003 - Claude Allen, who worked as a press aide for Jesse Helms in Helms' 1984 campaign against Jim Hunt. Allen, a former deputy attorney general in Virginia, also was stalled by Democrats after comments construed as anti-homosexual made by Allen while he worked for Helms were reported. His nomination lapsed, and Bush did not resubmit the nomination, instead appointing Allen last year to a policy adviser position.

Andrew Clark said:

It's easy to point to one issue (abortion) where Democrats are going in a direction supposedly opposite where the country is going and call them "anachronistic." The majority of the country is against Bush's social security plan, so does that mean Republicans are anachronistic? Democrats maybe shouldn't block as many nominees as they have, but some of them certainly don't deserve to be on the bench. As long as the Republicans in Congress are simply a rubber stamp to Bush's policies instead of a check and balance as they were designed to be, I applaud the Democrats for using whatever method they can to prevent a complete tyranny by the majority in this country.

dsquared said:

How about the criticisms of Boyle's activist anti-disability rulings, the philosophy of which was repudiated by the anything but liberal Fourth Circuit itself? Why are you so dismissive of this aspect of Boyle's record?

See http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/03/01/EDGJJBHDRV1.DTL and http://www.bazelon.org/issues/disabilityrights/judicialnominees/boyle.htm

When Boyle tried to claim that the ADA could only be implemented fairly by giving TOTAL deference to the employer's "business sense" despite the fact that the plain wording of the ADA called for an "interactive process" between employer and employee to determine what was a reasonable accomodation, the Fourth Circuit found Boyle's one-sided assesment to be ludicrous, and unsupported by precedent or the law itself. (Williams v. Channel Master 1996)
This is right-wing judicial activism at its worst and unbecoming of a nominee for our federal appellate courts.

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.