News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Off the Record

« A bloody reprisal in Ireland | Main | Grier and his rivals face public screening »

Students need more school choices

My column today:

For thousands of North Carolina high school seniors planning to continue their education next year, this is decision time. ...

They're lucky: They can choose from among dozens of outstanding public and private colleges and universities, without having to look outside the state. Somewhere not very far away, just the right school is waiting to hear from them.

But, what about cost? The UNC system and the state's community colleges offer the country's best bargains in higher education, but private institutions are expensive. The elite, like Duke, Davidson and Wake Forest, are practically out of sight.

Yet, it's not impossible for families with modest means to send their children even to the priciest private colleges and universities. Financial assistance is available, some of it from government. Funds include federal Pell grants as well as Legislative Tuition Grants, Student Incentive Grants and State Contractual Scholarships from the state of North Carolina.

These awards of public money can be applied even to private education. Why? It's good policy. Helping bright young people attend private colleges takes pressure off the public university system. The grants cost less than the expense to taxpayers of educating UNC system students, and students who go to private colleges don't take up space on a UNC campus. Policy makers also recognize that smaller private colleges can serve the academic needs of some students better than can larger public universities. The state's goal is to help as many of its young adults as possible achieve the best education they can so they'll become highly productive citizens and taxpayers.

Let's stop there a moment and consider those high school seniors who are preparing to launch their college careers. A short four years ago, they were finishing eighth grade and looking forward to high school. What choices did they have then?

For most of them, the options were narrow. Their public school board assigned them to a high school based on their residence. Everyone living in a certain attendance zone went to a certain school, maybe with some exceptions if the system offered magnet schools or special academies.

Otherwise, the remaining choices involved home-schooling or private schools. Private schools, like private colleges, can be expensive. But North Carolina students who want to attend private schools receive no financial assistance from state government.

It's time they should. It's time to implement the same policy at the K-12 level that works for higher education. It's time because K-12 education simply isn't serving the needs of all of North Carolina's children.

Just read Judge Howard Manning's warnings to the state's educational establishment to get an idea. In his latest edict last month, he threatened to close down high schools where fewer than 55 percent of students test at grade level.

The remedy sounds harsh, but the standard is low. High schools where 45 percent of students fall short are in the clear. Those schools pass, yet many of the kids don't.

They deserve more options. If they can't attend a public school that might better meet their needs, they should be able to choose a private school -- with financial help from the state, if they can't afford tuition otherwise.

The term commonly used for such a grant is a voucher. The word is widely reviled in public education circles because of the perception that vouchers will ruin public schools. What will be left of public school systems if more students leave for private schools?

Here's what will be left: Less-crowded but better-funded schools.

The value of a voucher, whether it's $2,000 or $5,000 a year, will be less than what the state spends to educate children. The money saved could be used to reduce class sizes and improve instruction in low-performing public schools.

Vouchers should be provided only for students from low- or moderate-income families. They should not be used to fund religious education. Schools that accept vouchers should not be allowed to discriminate in whom they admit, except based on students' behavior.

Not all private schools are better than all public schools. Some are better for some students. Shouldn't parents have greater opportunities to place their children in schools that might really help them? Wealthy families already have a full range of options. The state should open the door just a little wider for parents whose financial resources are more limited.

This principle works well for higher education in North Carolina. It doesn't weaken our public universities for the state to help students attend private colleges. One can argue it improves all colleges and universities, and there's no question it's good for the students.

North Carolina taxpayers should want to get the best result for every dollar they apply to educating young people. The more choices, the better the likely outcomes. Ask any high school senior making his or her college selection.

Comments (4)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Stormy said:

Doug,

I generally agree with your comments, except as regarding banning vouchers for students that their parents choose for their children to get a "religious" education. Why should those schools be banned? The parents pay their taxes just like anyone else, and if they choose for their children to receive their education in a religious setting, why should the government deny that to them?

You suggest that those schools discriminate in admission, but I don't believe that there is a requirement that a student has to adhere to a certain religious belief to be admited to a private religious school, disregarding what Hillary Clinton would like for us to believe.

Many private religious schools provide an excellent education, and many superior to what can be received in most public schools. It seems that we are practicing religious discrimination against those with religious beliefs, if we do not provide those parents and children the same eduatonal opportunities, because of their religious beliefs. It's fine to keep religion out of public schools, but parents and students should have options for their education in a religious setting, if they choose.

Doug said:

Thanks for reading, Stormy.

I think religious schools are a fine choice for many families but think they should be excluded from public funding. Otherwise, you run into the state-state separation issue. And I don't think many people would be happy to see their tax dollars going to support, say, radical Islamist education if such schools are developed here.

I don't think any schools that accept public funding should discriminate.

Stormy said:

Doug,

I generally agree with your comments, except as regarding banning vouchers for students that their parents choose for their children to get a "religious" education. Why should those schools be banned? The parents pay their taxes just like anyone else, and if they choose for their children to receive their education in a religious setting, why should the government deny that to them?

You suggest that those schools discriminate in admission, but I don't believe that there is a requirement that a student has to adhere to a certain religious belief to be admited to a private religious school, disregarding what Hillary Clinton would like for us to believe.

Many private religious schools provide an excellent education, and many superior to what can be received in most public schools. It seems that we are practicing religious discrimination against those with religious beliefs, if we do not provide those parents and children the same educational opportunities, because of their religious beliefs. It's fine to keep religion out of public schools, but parents and students should have options for their education in a religious setting, if they choose. That old Hillary Clinton scare tactic of Radical Islamic schools doesn't carry much weight. If they are doing something in the school that is illegal or not in the best intertests of our country's security, then school vouchers is the least of my concerns. I would venture to say that the vast majority of private religious schools don't advocate jihad in our country.

I suspect that great opposition to school vouchers for private religious schools is much more about eliminating comptition and options for parents outside of the public school system. This is the public schools' greatest fear, that parents wold learn what a lousy job they are doing of education. And, competition is exactly what the public schools need to force improvement in our schools, otherwise they have a monoply without motivation to improve or become more efficient and effective.

Barbara Ann said:

One of your best columns, Doug.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.