JLF says state can't influence climate change
North Carolina "can have no impact on climate change," the Raleigh-based John Locke Foundation asserts in a report issued today.
This is a stinging rebuke of the work of the N.C. Legislative Commission on Global Climate Change and its companion organization, the N.C. Climate Action Plan Advisory Group.
JLF contends that, despite acknowledgment that government efforts won't influence climate change, the North Carolina commission is pursuing an "irrational, 'we must do something'" strategy, which includes a "laundry list of possible policy prescriptions, all of which would ultimately alter the lifestyles of North Carolinians. ... In other words, the commission is looking to a host of policies, most of which would impose costs on and restrict the liberties of businesses and citizens of North Carolina, in full knowledge that none of the policies will have any benefits in terms of their ultimate goal -- averting or ameliorating climate change."
Instead, the state should develop a climate-change policy of "adaptation through economic growth," JLF says.
"Since the beginning of mankind people have had to deal with the extremes of weather. What has allowed us as a species to overcome extreme heat, cold, snowstorms, hurricanes, etc., and live comfortably both at the equator and in Alaska is prosperity. In this
context, probably the most important legacy that we can leave to future generations in terms of their ability to deal with the forces of nature (however mild or severe they would be) is a durable and useful capital stock in an economic system that allows entrepreneurs the flexibility to invest that capital in ways that will best accommodate people's desires for comfort in their surroundings.
"It is this capital stock that future generations will both draw on and build upon in developing new technologies that will allow us to ameliorate and be sheltered from the effects of weather conditions. The fact is that our generation and the generations immediately preceding ours have been able to live more comfortably in the face of weather extremes because of the capital investment and technological advancements of the generations that have preceded us."
Interesting perspective. It overlooks the benefits unrelated to climate change of reducing pollution and conserving energy. But if policymakers set a goal of stopping global warming, they should be honest with the public about the chances of success.
Comments (5)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
I think here the John Locke Foundation has popped their cork. 180 mph winds and thirty foot storm surges laugh at technology no matter how smart the little buggers coming out of MIT and Harvard become in the future.
I guess we could all move underground and develop one heck of a sump pump.
Posted on December 11, 2006 4:28 PM
The fact is that our generation and the generations immediately preceding ours have been able to live more comfortably in the face of weather extremes because of the capital investment and technological advancements of the generations that have preceded us."* JL Nephew early industrial revolution researcher with the little bird in the Cage at the bottom of the Sheffield mine shaft #9
Tell that to the former citizens of New Orleans about the amazing capital investment by the US Army Corp of Engineers over 100 years with those technological advance Dikes. Oh heck! What's a few thousand dead poor blacks to rebutt this report with real factical body counts.
I am prepare to arranged a 4 month tour of a North Sea Oil rig in the middle of the winter season for the whole JLF staff to test their theory and in depth mega corporate oil report.
Posted on December 11, 2006 5:22 PM
North Carolina "can have no impact on climate change," the Raleigh-based John Locke Foundation asserts in a report issued today.* Doug
Sounds like the Haliburton Corporation and the Blackwater Group got to together to ghost write this monster grown myth report.
Posted on December 11, 2006 5:28 PM
By Locke Foundation logic no person should give money to the poor because they can't end poverty. Of course this state alone can't affect climate change, but if every state does something we can. It also seems to me a little bit absurd to just rely on the market to fix the problem. Isn't a better idea to lessen or if possible avoid a problem than to bet on someone being able to solve it once it's here? I think it's irresponsible and dangerous to assume that the market will solve all problems so we should just sit back and ignore them.
Posted on December 12, 2006 2:42 AM
I suppose JLF believes that such wonderful prosperity will also allow us to aid the less fortunate to rebuild or relocate when their own economic plight does not permit them to escape the effects of climate change? Otherwise, I guess they mean "We got ours" and "Let 'em eat cake".
Posted on December 12, 2006 6:26 AM