Impressions of Obama
After seeing and hearing Barack Obama in person for the first time this afternoon, I better understand the phenomenon that is his presidential campaign.
He's really terrific with a live audience ... not so much charismatic as confident, comfortable and in control. He connects with people, communicates, convinces. He's got wit, personality, intelligence.
If you're a Democrat you might be thinking, hmmm, the last guy we had with all those qualities was ... not Kerry ... not Gore ... yes, Bill Clinton. And he won! Twice!
OK, let me add another word: Disciplined. Obama is, Bill Clinton isn't.
Obama's discipline is remarkable. He stays on message and doesn't wander into corners. He's just not going to say stupid things.
He opened with the familiar themes ...
Why he's running: It's the "fierce urgency of now" (borrowing from MLK). This is a "defining moment" for America. There's a long list of problems to address: the war in Iraq, a "flatlining" economy, lack of health care, failing schools ...
On change: "I was convinced we couldn't solve these problems unless we changed the way politics worked in Washington." Which means bringing people together, challenging the special interests (Republican and Democrat) that dominate Washington, listening to the people.
In detail, though, many of his ideas are pretty standard liberal Democrat Washington-can-solve-all-problems-with-more-money stuff. And, no matter what he says about special interests, when Washington spends tons of money, there are special interests lined up for their share.
The answer for schools is to invest more in early childhood education and raise teacher pay. Set high standards but don't measure progress with a single high-stakes test. We want kids to learn art, music, history and all the other subjects that contribute to a well-rounded education. With No Child Left Behind, the federal government left the money behind.
We've got to make higher education affordable by providing a $4,000 tuition credit for each student per year for four years. But students have to give something back, like volunteer work at a homeless shelter or a stint in the Peace Corps (I don't know if that's a payback because it probably costs about another $4,000 a year to keep a PC volunteer in the field; anyway, there's no shortage of PC volunteers already). Obama said states are giving less money to their universities because their budgets are strapped (one reason: "They're building more jails.") The federal government should send more money to the states.
Reducing poverty requires, first thing, reminding ourselves that in a wealthy country we shouldn't have very poor people. President Bush's economic policies, however, don't care about the poor. The government should expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and cut taxes for families earning less than $75,000. We need to create jobs that pay living wages. The money spent in Iraq should be spent instead for roads and bridges here. We should create a green economy. And we all need to have "a change of heart about what America is all about."
On immigration, Obama called for better border security and better monitoring of people in this country on visas. Next, a crackdown on employers hiring illegal immigrants (this drew big applause). That would still leave 10-12 million undocumented workers here, he said, and there aren't enough resources to round them up and ship them out (I wondered if they would still be called undocumented "workers" if all their employers were cracked down on.) Obama said they have broken the law and should be fined, made to pay back taxes, learn English and go to the back of the immigration line in order to earn a pathway to eventual citizenship.
On pay and benefits for workers, Obama said he supports trade agreements that enforce labor and environmental standards. He wants to "strengthen our unions," in one way through the "Employee Free Choice Act." (In my view, the measure is misnamed, as it allows union certification by "card check" method and blocks employers from calling for secret-ballot elections; secret ballot always is more conducive to "free choice," but Obama is trying to help unions, not employers.)
Obama gives the impression he would be hard on businesses. He wants to add windfall profits taxes on oil companies and penalties on "polluters" to generate "billions of dollars" for federal research aimed to achieve "energy independence." He wants to eliminate private lenders from the college loan business, using the money they would make in profits to benefit students. (I hope he doesn't decide newspapers are making "obscene profits" to justify some federal crackdown on us.)
Maybe the most interesting segment was his response to a question about his personal religious faith. He described himself as a Christian who believes he will attain everlasting life because Jesus died for his sins. "I also believe in a gospel of not just words but deeds" This means caring for the poor, applying the Golden Rule, being a good steward of the earth, treating people with kindness. "I've tried to channel this into my politics."
He added that good people who happen to be Jews or Moslems are not "less children of God." His late mother, he said, was the kindest person he knew but not a Christian. "I'm sure she's in heaven."
He took the opportunity to return to the subject of Jeremiah Wright, his former pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. (Note: The invocation for Obama's event was delivered by Greensboro's Rev. Cardes Brown. An irony?) Obama insisted that Wright's objectionable statements made up only a tiny fraction of his ministerial output, and the controversy should not become a distraction from more important issues.
Obama is a talented politician who stands a very good chance of winning the presidency. He warned that he is not a perfect man and will not be a perfect president. People will disagree with some of his views and actions, he said (hard to believe of the adoring people in the audience today), but of course he's right. I think any politician who promises that government can fix all problems will end up disappointing people. However, he's persuasive in arguing that government can do a better job.
Having witnessed Obama's "town hall meeting" today, I see why he's done particularly well in smaller states and in caucuses. I'll bet, among voters who have seen him in person, he's way ahead. As the campaign wears on, however, and the public and media bear in more closely on his policies in detail, he'll begin to lose many of the moderate voters who have supported him to this point. That doesn't mean John McCain will win them, but for all his personal appeal and desire to unite Americans, Obama will not win -- if he wins -- by a landslide.
Comments (10)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
That doesn't mean John McCain will win them, but for all his personal appeal and desire to unite Americans, Obama will not win -- if he wins -- by a landslide.* Doug
Ask yourself one question Doug! Do really believe that any of the candiates will be able to solve the massive problems that is destroying the United States as we know it in the 21 st century, without it becoming a Police State?
Posted on March 26, 2008 7:31 PM
How many people fainted?
Posted on March 26, 2008 7:35 PM
The U.S. is not going to become a police state.
Maybe some swooning but no fainting, Maria.
Posted on March 26, 2008 8:57 PM
The U.S. is not going to become a police state.*Doug
That is what some Germans said in the 20's after massive inflation, massive unemployment, along other establishment excuses to the Obama's supporters and the McCain of that time.
Maybe some swooning but no fainting, Maria.* Doug
The only person to faint was Doug when Candiate Obama said the winning lottary ticket for today was in the name of somebody call Clark!
Posted on March 26, 2008 9:31 PM
I'd laugh out loud if, after all the puritanical editorializing on the subject, somebody named Clark or Johnson won the lottery.
On Obama, I don't doubt his "charisma" (or whatever). In fact, he's the first candidate said to have this quality who, in my opinion, actually has it--that is, who doesn't strike me as a flat-out phony. Without question, he's the only presidential candidate in recent memory who could convincingly play the president in a movie.
For this reason, I think he'll kill McCain (who strikes me as a thoroughly unlikeable guy) in the debates. As counterstrategy, McCain will have to do three things in order to win: (1) racialize Obama, subtly, as a covert Wright who, if elected, will start pushing for nutty things like reparations, (2) radicalize him as the most liberal vote in the Senate, (3) where's-the-beef him, based on his thin legislative record and "no-vote" record in Illinois, as an empty suit.
I agree: close election, either way.
Posted on March 26, 2008 11:44 PM
Good question Maria but I think mass weeping has repalced hypnotized awe and fainting at Obama appearances
Posted on March 27, 2008 10:48 AM
He's just not going to say stupid things?
What about "typical white person"?
What about not saying smart things? I know he say's many smart things - but his response to the Wright hoopla was spin, deflection, and just plain not enough (imho) - which to me, was stupid.
Posted on March 27, 2008 11:15 AM
Maria,
Oh yeah, people in the audioence applaud when he blows his nose
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass_28feb28,0,7728783.column
Posted on March 28, 2008 10:53 PM
"Maybe the most interesting segment was his response to a question about his personal religious faith."
Interesting because he spoke of works and non-Christians going to heaven?
Posted on May 5, 2008 9:43 AM
It's interesting to me when prominent political leaders talk candidly about their personal faith.
Posted on May 5, 2008 9:59 AM