News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Off the Record

« Fun while it lasted | Main | Biden: a mature, serious choice »

The difference between face-to-face conversations and free-for-alls on the blog

In today's Counterpoint, George F. Sowers presents an idea he thinks is pure brilliance:

Mechanically restrict all vehicles to a top speed of 55 mph.

"I have spoken to a lot of people personally about this proposed law and have not found anyone yet who would oppose it," he writes.

Obviously, he didn't speak with the people who comment on the letters blog. They're subjecting his idea to considerable ridicule.

How to explain the different reactions?

My guess is that Mr. Sowers is a nice man, and people who listened to him explain his idea in person simply didn't want to be disagreeable. They preferred to humor him rather than risk hurting his feelings.

There are no such sensitivities on the letters blog, where almost everyone is anonymous and unrestrained. Without having to "face" anyone else or reveal their own identities, they feel free to bash away.

It's not polite discourse but it's honest. Sometimes brutally honest.

Comments (5)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

tonymo [TypeKey Profile Page] said:

Doug, Please believe me when I say that I would much rather speak to these folks face to face. I would be free to express myself in terms not appropriate for public dissemenaton!

Of course, there are some writers that I'd like to thank in person for proposing some ideas that I wish I'd done as eloquently. Yes, I know that's hard to believe!

Doug said:

Tony, you're an exception. You'll be, er, frank with anyone.

Sensei said:

Seriously? I would openly laugh in Mr. Sowers face without even pausing for one iota to think about his ridiculous idea. Sure, it might save a little fuel and help to reduce our dependency on foreign oil, but at what cost? Incessant traffic jams? Illegally modified vehicles to remove the limiter? I can even envision an increased likelihood of accidents because it will become increasingly difficult to merge onto highways.

What a horrible, laughable idea.

Doug said:

Yes, definitely there are times when the ability to accelerate gets you or keeps you out of trouble.

On a two-lane road with fairly short straightaways, you'd be doomed to stay behind a car or truck driving 45-50 mph. "Accelerating" to a max of 55 wouldn't let you pass.

Holden said:


Somehow I'm really not all that interested in saving gas -

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.