Libertarians endorse true marriage equality
Maine's "act to end discrimination in civil marriage," doesn't live up to its name, the Libertarian Party says.
While the new law, signed by Maine's governor yesterday, ends the prohibition on same-sex marriage and also marriages of first cousins, it leaves other restrictions.
Among them:
"A person may not marry that person's parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle or first cousin."
(First cousins may marry, the law goes on, if they have had genetic counseling.)
Also:
"A marriage contracted while either party has a living wife or husband from whom
the party is not divorced is void."
In a statement yesterday, the Libertarian Party praised Maine's action but urged states "to take the proper approach to marriage equality and repeal government definitions and regulation of marriage entirely."
Donny Ferguson, Libertarian National Committee communications director, explained:
“The Libertarian Party position is simple. The government should not police consensual agreements between adults. Government should recognize the marriage of any consenting parties entering into an agreement, and businesses and individuals should retain the right to choose for themselves who to bestow private benefits to.
"We are the only party that not only supports marriage equality, but would completely do away with government's ability to restrict it."
The same-sex marriage movement has tremendous momentum, but changes to marriage likely won't end even if it reaches its objectives in all 50 states. I believe the Libertarians have correctly identified one possible conclusion -- government recognition of all consensual agreements between or among adults as, effectively, a marriage, without restrictions.
The other possible conclusion is that it recognizes none.
Nothing else is true "equality" as that's being currently defined.
Comments (4)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
"We are the only party that not only supports marriage equality, but would completely do away with government's ability to restrict it."* Confuse Transgender Libertarian Spokesperson
Does this mean that the Party supports marriage between Humans and Monkeys?
Posted on May 7, 2009 11:46 AM
If both the human and the monkey consent, then sure. That's their business, not ours. I think the Libertarian Party is essentially saying MYOB. More of us should follow that rule.
Posted on May 7, 2009 2:22 PM
Come on, the Libertarians are talking about people. No animal exploitation here.
Posted on May 7, 2009 2:42 PM
Come on, the Libertarians are talking about people. No animal exploitation here.* Doug
Oh come on! What makes you think Monkeys don't have Pimps in Libertarian politics?
Posted on May 8, 2009 1:29 PM