In defense of flip-flopping
This week's column.
As an incurable Green Bay Packers fan, I don’t know what to make of quarterback Brett Favre’s messy flirtation with a comeback after announcing his retirement several months ago.
On the one hand, I believe Favre has earned the right to have second thoughts about walking away from a game he loves so much, gave so much to and still is able to play so well.
Then again, I also understand why Packers management feels jerked around.
Favre has retired and unretired before. He contacted the Packers, saying he wanted to come back in March. The team was scheduled to join him in a public announcement.
Then he said never mind. He wasn’t coming back after all.
Now he’s reversed field again.
And I’ve changed my mind about him changing his mind.
At first I considered him fickle and selfish and indecisive.
Now I’m beginning to understand how it’s so hard to walk away, especially given the remarkable condition of this 38-year-old man’s body.
He has meant so much to the game and especially to the Packers — playing hurt ... winning almost through sheer will ... bringing a boyish playfulness to pro football even as more and more gray hairs sprouted on his head and chin ... not missing a start for a gazillion games — that I’ll cut him some slack.
Then — as in five days ago, I said he was a jerk. Now I say a man is entitled to change his mind. Unless, I guess, he’s a politician.
If an elected official dares to change his mind, he might as well curse God and country. Or, even worse, not wear a flag pin.
Positions are made, at least in politics, to be kept. Forever.
Or we’ll make you pay.

