News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Thinking Out Loud

« A marvelous Morehead morning | Main | A jogger runs through it »

Judge Daisy's day in court

Now that retired District Court Judge William Daisy has admitted that he "hugged, touched and engaged in physical contact" with two women while still serving on the Guilford County bench, what is the appropriate punishment?

As Eric Collins reported in Saturday's News & Record, a lawyer for the Judicial Standards Commission has brokered an agreement with Daisy that he would never serve as a substitute judge in this state, a common practice among retired judges.

Daisy also agreed to accept a censure from the state Supreme Court. The commission, whose decision in Daisy's case won't be known for as long as a month, could go along with that agreement.Or not.It may accept the suggested reprimands. Or it could go a step further and "remove" Daisy, which would erase his retirement benefits.

Then it still won't be over. The Supreme Court in turn could accept or reject the commission's verdict.

The lack of local outrage about all this continues to confound. Here is a man who abused his position of power more than once to make unwanted advances and say untoward things to women. This was common knowledge, say colleagues and court workers.

But many of us still have a hard time accepting sexual harassment in the workplace as all that big a deal ... even in, of all workplaces, the county courthouse.

(Daisy's two accusers deserve praise for stepping forward. So does Chief District Judge Joseph Turner, for notifying the appropriate state officials of their complaints. Too bad some of his Daisy's colleagues on the bench knew of his indiscretions and did not act.)

Here also is a man who had a previous brush with insensitivity when he sent a series of lewd emails that contained racist, sexist and anti-Semitic jokes -- and sexually explicit cartoons -- to friends and colleagues in 2003.

The material was more objectionable than you might imagine. You've only heard the tamest stuff. I still keep the stack of printed emails in my office files. I just can't share some of the worse examples because they are not publishable, on the Internet or anywhere else.

Some of them were more suited for Hustler or Penthouse.

Daisy apologized then and stepped down as chief District Court judge. He apologized again on Friday, at his Judicial Standards Commission hearing. He says he is receiving counseling now, which he obviously needs. One can only wonder if Daisy might have done if he were hearing his own case. One can only wonder if, as the tough but fair judge many praise him for being, Daisy would have given himself the same breaks he's now seeking.

Fool me once, shame on you, I can hear him saying.


Comments (6)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Ken Starr said:

The lack of outrage about this confounds you ? Was your outrage AWOL when Juanita Broderick told of being forcibly raped by Bill Clinton or when Kathleen Willey believably related being groped by then President Clinton. Your ed page favorite Doonebury is relentless in it's ridicule of Governor Schwarzenegger as the " Gropenator ". Your double standard confounds me.

mr. sun said:

Yes, and where is your outrage over Joseph Stalin? About one million people were shot between 1935 and 1950 and millions were transported to Gulag labour camps -- but you write about Judge Daisy.

Roch101 said:

Allen, when is somebody going to start fact checking Davenport?

Allen Johnson said:

On Davenport, Roch, we do flag obvious errors of fact, as we do with all writers, including staff members. have we missed something?

Roch101 said:

Hi Allen,

Sorry for the delay in replying. Hopefully you'll see this. Since I missed Davenport's article in print, I am going by what others report, specifically that he cited a letter from Thomas Jefferson. Apparently there are two problems with that letter, one it has been bastardized from the original version which was, two, by George Washington. See http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/monument.asp

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.