News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Thinking Out Loud

« Crying wolf several times too many | Main | This week's column »

What (ought to be) black and white and red all over?

My good friend and co-worker, News & Record Editor John Robinson, will speak as a part of a panel Saturday morning on diversity in newsroom.

Sponsored by Triad Black Media Professionals, and scheduled for 11 a.m. in the New Classroom Building at N.C. A&T, the panel will address the question: "The Road to Diversity: Are We There Yet?"

To prime the pump for discussion, here's some historical perspective on whether it really matters who shapes and reports the content of newspapers.

First, this excerpt from the Kerner Commission Report of 1968, compiled in the wake of a disturbing wave of racial upheaval:

"The journalistic profession has been shockingly backward in seeking out, hiring, training, and promoting Negroes. Fewer than 5 percent of the people employed by the news business in editorial jobs in the United States today are Negroes. Fewer than 1 percent of editors and supervisors are Negroes, and most of them work for Negro-owned organizations, The lines of various news organizations to the militant blacks are, by admission of the newsmen themselves, almost nonexistent. The plaint is "We can't find qualified Negroes."

"But this rings hollow from an industry where, only yesterday, jobs were scarce and promotion unthinkable for a man whose skin was black. Even today, there are virtually no Negroes in positions of editorial or executive responsibility and there is only one Negro newsman with a nationally syndicated column.

"News organizations must employ enough Negroes in positions of significant responsibility to establish an effective link to Negro actions and ideas and to meet legitimate employment expectations. Tokenism -- the hiring of one Negro reporter, or even two or three --is no longer enough. Negro reporters are essential, but so are Negro editors, writers and commentators. Newspaper and television policies are, generally speaking, not set by reporters. Editorial decisions about which stories to cover and which to use are made by editors. Yet, very few Negroes in this country are involved in making these decisions, because very few, if any, supervisory editorial jobs are held by Negroes. We urge the news media to do everything possible to train and promote their Negro reporters to positions where those who are qualified can contribute to and have an effect on policy decisions. . . ."

How far have we come since then?

From 30 years later, in 1998, this is the mission statement by the American Society of Newspaper Editors on newsroom diversity:

"To cover communities fully, to carry out their role in a democracy, and to succeed in the marketplace, the nation's newsrooms must reflect the racial diversity of American society by 2025 or sooner. At a minimum, all newspapers should employ journalists of color and every newspaper should reflect the diversity of its community."

Part of an ASNE release on newsroom hiring in 2004: "Newsrooms at U.S. daily newspapers collectively improved their diversity by nearly a half of one percentage point in 2003, but the growth to 12.94 percent lagged behind the 31.7 percent minorities in the U.S. population."

Also in that release, this quote from ASNE President Peter Bhatia: "The number of minorities in American newspapers continues to grow, which is a good thing, but the increase is at a snail's pace, and the overall total is still woefully low. As the economy improves and hiring increases, it is time for all of us in the industry to step up and move this number more quickly towards parity."

You may have read what John has written before about our unacceptably low levels of minority news staffers at the News & Record, which is below the national average, which is below where any of us ought to be in 2005.

Comments (8)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

F. Reid said:

One should only look to the future not the past. The color of one's skin does not make one qualified for anything. Qualifying comes from hard work and skills to perform.
"We must remember our past while improving our future"

Chewie said:

I didn't read anywhere in Allen's post that the N&R intended to hire anyone who was unqualified.

In fact on Feb. 2, Allen posted this:
"The new hiring initiative will involve only qualified hires, whatever their race or gender. That's a given."

There's much more about the N&R's hiring initiative, including why they feel it is necessary, on both Allen's and John Robinson's blogs.

Start here:
Link: http://blog.news-record.com/staff/outloud/archives/2005/02/davenports_scre_1.html

and here:

http://blog.news-record.com/jrblog/archives/2004/11/my_sunday_newsp.html

and here:

http://blog.news-record.com/staff/jrblog/archives/2004/12/discriminatory.html

Seymour Hardy Floyd said:

Just to switch gears ever so slightly, let's apply this to education.

If African-Americans or other minorities raise the issue of having a more diverse teaching staff so that their children will have teachers who look more like them and possibly share a more similar cultural background, is that legitimate?

I'd be willing to bet that a lot of whites would say that the skin color of the teacher should not matter. A good teacher is a good teacher, and skin color does not make a difference.

In many respects, such thinking is correct, or at least should be.

But as a male middle-school teacher, I know that I have had parents tell me every year how glad they are that I am in education so that their sons will have at least one male teacher. Some even come out and say that their sons respond better to male teachers than they do to female teachers.

This raises some interesting issues.

Is there a problem with how those parents are raising their sons? Shouldn't students respect all teachers and not show more respect to male teachers than females teachers?

Or are boys (and girls) actually better off having teachers who represent both sexes?

And then, how does this apply to race?

It's easy--very easy--for white parents to say that the race of a teacher should not matter to a child.

But what if you have a child who has never had a teacher who shares the same skin color as the child?

And what if you live in America, which has improved a great deal with regards to issues of race but which still has far, far to go?

Yes, of course, the race of the teacher should not matter.

But it's a whole lot easier to say that as a white than as an African-American.

I guarantee you that it would matter to a great many of these whites (who complain about blacks complaining about a lack of diversity) if their white children went to school without ever having a white teacher.

For most white parents, this is far beyond their imaginations because they have come nowhere close to being confronted by this.

I guarantee you that the issue would be regarded very differently under such circumstances.

And of course it SHOULD not matter if every teacher a white student has is non-white.

I remember taking an African-American literature class at UNC-Chapel Hill. The class was taught by a black professor. I got together with a black female student to study for an exam. She confessed that it meant something to her to take this particular class because it was the first time she had ever had a black teacher. So going all the way from kindergarten to her junior year of college, this young lady whose skin was black had never had a black teacher. And of course, it didn't and it shouldn't have mattered. And yet it did. She was not complaining about her white teachers. She was extremely intelligent, and I would guess that at least some of her white teachers had had a significant and probably positive impact on her intellectual and educational development. (I'd even be willing to guess that she knew and appreciated this.) But still it meant something to have at least one teacher who shared her skin color.

And if white students ever faced such circumstances, I am almost certain that it would matter to a majority of those students and their parents if the white students had at least one white teacher along the way. (Some would want many more than just one white teacher along the way.)

Fathers and mothers of sons never even seem to feel guilty telling me that they are pleased to have me as a male teacher/role model for their sons.

Should African-American parents feel guilty for expressing appreciation when at least one (or more) of their children's teachers are black?

And should this be taken into consideration when schools and school systems hire teachers?

We are not talking about lowering standards here. But if a school has only white teachers or only a very small number of African-American teachers, should the race of the applicants be given some consideration?

There may well be--and probably are--some instances where a grossly less qualified minority is hired instead of a significantly better qualified white.

But I bet there are more instances where you could flip a coin in the decision-making process.

A former News & Record editor, David DuBuisson, wrote a column once about this issue with regards to a lawsuit filed by a white student who was rejected by Duke University while a black student she knew was accepted. (I am sharing this from memory, so I hope I've got all the details correct.) As I recall, the white student claimed that she was much more qualified than the black student; her claim was that she was being discriminated against. Duke University could not share all details of the students' applications and records because of confidentiality issues, but I believe the university indicated that the white student's claims were not accurate. I remember appreciating several of DuBuisson's columns, but this one particularly stuck out as an intelligent, important piece of writing. (I need to look it up. I'm assuming it's in the archives; Mr. Johnson, would it be possible to make it available within one of your postings?)

I believe that one of DuBuisson's primary points was how difficult it was to choose between two people whose records are very similar. And yet universities and businesses have to do this, no doubt, with some regularity.

Is a university better off getting a white student with a perfect SAT score and fairly good grades than a black student with only an average SAT score but slightly better grades? (This is only one of infinite scenerios that could be painted and shared, with arguments that could go in countless directions about what could and should be taken into account when making such decisions.)

Do the same people who complain so much about race being considered share the same concerns about universities taking into consideration that the student is in-state or that the students' parents graduated from the same school to which they are now applying?

(Keep in mind that taking into consideration whether parents graduated from a previously all-white university automatically put blacks at a disadvantage in the past. And while many white students growing up today take it for granted that they will someday go to college, this is true for fewer blacks. Going to college is often a family tradition; blacks were not allowed to develop such a family tradition with the same frequency as whites. So yes, everything is perfectly equal today, and yet because of the past, it's also not. And if whites want to blame anyone for that, they may have to go where they do not want to go and that is to the place where they place more blame on white ancestors than they do on the people trying to figure out "fair" ways to undo the "unfair" legacies from the past.)

Now, I know I have not done much to contribute to the issue of diversity in the newsroom. (Just in case anyone's interested, I think diversity in the newsroom is preferable, so that different races, genders, and yes, even philosophies (and maybe even intellecutal levels) are represented.) I'm not sure if any of what I've expressed about how diversity matters to education relates to how diversity might matter within the media.

I've only touched on some concerns, and there are others.

I do feel that the people who argue that we are beyond the point of ever needing to take race into consideration are perhaps a little naive. Some bleeding-heart conservatives try to suggest that everything would work beautifully if we just stopped paying attention to race at all and only took into account ability and performance, but what these people ignore is that some of them (or at least some of their friends) would still take race into consideration and just not realize or acknowledge it--and blacks and others would suffer because of that.

Allen Johnson said:

You raise some very compelling points, Mr. Floyd.
I'll search the archives for the column you're referring to from my former colleague, David DuBuisson, and post it soon.

Otto said:

It will be a cold day in you-know-where when the N&R reflects the diversity of the community. We're 50% Bush-backers, by tally of the last presidential election.
Your staff is nowhere close to that. Not even in the ballpark. Not even in the same league. Not even...well, you get my point.
The N&R steadfastly caters to the liberal left in it's stories, editorials, and staffing. To fill your little cubicles with less qualified "tokens" of one race or color merely because they're not white does nothing for the credibility or quality of your newspaper. I consider it racist to discriminate for or against a person because of the color of their skin. Apparently the N&R doesn't care about that basic human right.
Why not a program to hire "conservatives" to level out your staff and really reflect the diversity of your community?
I won't hold my breath...

I'm still waiting for that policy on hiring real minorities: one-armed men, Icelandic women, midgets, etc. They make up a portion of the population too, so why do they get dumped on and not equally represented? I demand real affirmative action!

Allen: Any luck finding that column? Hardy Floyd has got my curiosity up.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.