This week's column
He should have seen this one coming.
Skip Alston's tumble from the presidency last week of the state NAACP was almost inevitable. Alston, a businessman/county commissioner/political power broker, has been so relentlessly self-absorbed that it was only a matter of time before he tripped over his own inflated ego.
The real shame here is not Alston's defeat as it is his mission to do at nearly every turn what's best for .... Skip Alston. What a waste of smarts and talent.
Rarely has one person done so little with so much.
Brenda Cogdell, a local advocate for the homeless, was delighted by Alston's NAACP defeat. She has roundly criticized him for his role as manager of the perennially troubled St. James Homes apartments, whose residents have had to cope, over and over, with crime, drugs and disrepair.
"I have managed properties,"Cogdell said last week,"and I know you can make people comfortable in their homes. I was told you walk your properties first thing in the morning and last thing in the evening when you leave. If I can do that, (Alston) certainly can do the same thing at St. James."
Some have been reluctant to criticize Alston, for fear of the payback that often follows, but Cogdell said she didn't care. "What's he gonna do, not hire me to work in his barbecue restaurant?"
Meanwhile, Mike Barber, the City Council candidate and former county commissioner, said he regretted Alston's defeat. "If anybody has a right to be frustrated with Skip Alston, I do,"Barber said. "But anytime we've got a state leader from Greensboro, it can be a positive thing."
Alston appeared at first blush to accept his defeat after nine straight years as state president with dignity and grace. He posed for photos with the man who unseated him, the Rev. William Barber of Goldsboro. He wished Barber well. "It's not about the position,"he said, "it's about the cause."
Of course, Alston went on to chalk up his defeat to his not "getting out the vote."Days later, he added another thick layer of denial, charging that there had been election irregularities. In other words, he was robbed.
After those comments had appeared in print, Alston said he didn't mean the "irregularities"caused his defeat. "Of course there were some irregularities,"he said. "But I'm not dwelling on that. I don't think they influenced the outcome of the election."
As for St. James, how can an elected leader and (now former) state NAACP president possibly manage such a sad example of substandard, crime-ridden housing? "I'm not even talking about St. James anymore," he said. "Y'all do whatever you want on St. James. I don't look for any mercy from you and your newspaper."
Alston added he is a media target because he is "unbought and unbossed — a voice for the community without being intimidated that my job will be at stake."But he can take it, he added: "People criticized Jesus Christ."
Alston continues to create his own reality, in which he's the good guy and everybody else is a racist. Or a pawn of racists. Enough already.
It isn't racism that made him manage St. James Homes so poorly. It isn't racism that makes Alston shrug at the plight of the residents there, and ask helplessly, "We've got some things that need to be done, but what place doesn't?"
What a waste. He is clearly the smartest member of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners. He is a savvy businessman, a shrewd politician and a compelling public speaker. He and state Rep. Earl Jones had the foresight and vision to conceive the downtown civil rights museum. And he does have a point about being "unbossed."The most fearless and independent black leaders historically have been preachers and funeral directors because they answered only to their constituents. As a successful, self-employed businessman, Alston enjoys that same latitude.
As for being "unbought,"that's an entirely different matter. Alston remains a paid lobbyist for the billboard industry, which is unseemly for an elected official if not illegal. And part of the hot water he encountered in the NAACP involved his support for payday lenders in North Carolina, in opposition to national NAACP policy.
He is so focused on Doing What's Good for Skip that he misses opportunities to be what he really ought to be: one of the county's most effective servant leaders.
Of course, smart people can benefit and grow from the lessons of their failures. Did Alston learn anything from his NAACP defeat?
"There's no message,"he said. "People can't say people voted against me because I'm not a very good leader. I know I'm a good leader."
Guess we've got our answer.
Comments (12)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
You could have reduced this column to one line, which pretty much sums up Alston's public life:
"The real shame here is not Alston's defeat as it is his mission to do at nearly every turn what's best for .... Skip Alston."
The other interesting line is that Alston likens himself to "Jesus Christ."
If this is really Greensboro's "best and brightest" then I pity the future of our community.
Posted on October 16, 2005 11:10 AM
Great column, Allen.
Posted on October 16, 2005 6:04 PM
I appreciate your leadership and your frank treatment of this topic.
Posted on October 16, 2005 7:58 PM
So true, Allen. We can only hope Skip looses his next election. I hear his hot dogs are good, maybe he needs to stick with doing what he's good at.
Posted on October 16, 2005 10:16 PM
Wow, that was the most brutal, yet the most polite skewering of a public official I've ever read. Great column.
I think you're right about the billboard thing as well. I don't know NC law but I can't believe it's not a conflict of interest, especially if he sits on any decisions having to do with billboards. Not to mention using his public position to engage in lobbying doesn't smell right either. I wonder why his political opponents don't challenge that?
Posted on October 17, 2005 3:56 PM
Libby, I agree. The North Carolina conflict-of-interest law is vague and impotent. But there's very little political will to change it.
Posted on October 17, 2005 4:13 PM
Come to think of it , selling hot dogs in a good BBQ place is a conflict of interest or at least should be.
The best BBQ place I remember in G'boro , and it has been closed for several years now, was Daddy Kings.( I believe that was the name) located over in a not too pretty part of town but the risk of going there after dark was worth the ribs and pulled pork . MMMMMMMMMMMM.
Posted on October 17, 2005 7:35 PM
Kings, on Phillips Ave. Unbelievable ribs, served with white toast. Mr. King made visitors feel safe and welcome.
Posted on October 17, 2005 8:01 PM
Hey Ed, I thought that Daddy Kings closed sometime around 99 or 2000? I had heard that he had passed and his son had taken over and then decided to close the place.
You are right about the ribs and toast, dang I can taste them now. I have yet to find any better anywhere in my travels.,
Yep and you are right about Daddy King making you feel safe. I always felt welcome there anytime , day or night.
Posted on October 18, 2005 11:55 AM
Allen,
I've got to hand it to you. It took big ones to write this article. One of your finest pieces to date.
What barbecue restaurant does Alston own? Even though I don't like the man's politics, I can still enjoy a good hot dog now and then.
BTW, Daddy Kings was great! We use to call him doo doo ball King but that's a whole another story. Believe it or not, it was an affectionate term.
Posted on October 18, 2005 5:00 PM
Yep, King's closed, and has not to my knowledge been replaced by anything close to as good.
Posted on October 18, 2005 7:51 PM
Gee, you guys are making me hungry. Mr. King, by the way, taught at Lincoln Junior High when I attended there. His daughter was one of my schoolmates at UNC-CH. I remember the first location of his restaurant on Gorrell Street and then the later location near where I grew up, on Phillips Avenue.
There was no better barbecue anywhere. I'm surprised Bledsoe hasn't weighed in. I recall he wrote about King's more than once.
Posted on October 19, 2005 8:09 AM