My colleague, Doug Clark, blogged the other day about Ann Coulter, freedom of speech and, in a flashback to his days as an undergrad at Carolina, the erstwhile Pied Piper of the KKK, David Duke.
Doug laments that a group of protesting students prevented Duke from speaking in 1974 at UNC's Memorial Hall. I was one of them.
Here is my account of that night, reprinted from a column I wrote in 2002:
NOW AND THEN: On doubting Thomas and dissing Duke
In the spring of my sophomore year, David Duke, Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, coolly approached the podium in Memorial Hall at UNC Chapel Hill.
He was a handsome, charismatic man, in much the same way that John Edwards is today -- dapper in a three-piece suit and impeccably groomed. It was as if the Klan suddenly had discovered Madison Avenue.
A sustained chorus of raucous jeers erupted from a group of mostly African American protesters. As he began to speak, the jeers grew louder, among them a familiar refrain, "Go to hell, Duke."
When the sound technician increased the volume on Duke's microphone, the hecklers followed suit.
I should know. I was one of them.
As it turned out, Duke did have his say that night, but not in Memorial Hall. After several vain attempts to outshout his critics, Duke retreated to a room in the Morehead Planetarium, where he addressed a smaller, more cordial audience. There, he likened black people to chimpanzees, assailed affirmative action and repeated his intentions to recruit on campus for the KKK.
The incident reverberated around the state and the country. Had we infringed on Duke's right to free speech? Had we squelched the free exchange of ideas on, of all places, a college campus, where healthy debate especially should thrive?
Flash forward to the spring of 2002. Five black professors in the UNC School of Law announced that they would boycott a campus appearance by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. In a written statement they explained that Thomas "is not just another Supreme Court justice with whom we disagree. Since Justice Thomas's appointment to the Court, replacing Justice Thurgood Marshall, he has provided the critical fifth vote in a number of decisions that have set back the quest for racial equality and social justice in this country."
Editorialists railed at the irony that in a school that fosters intellectual debate, faculty would pass up that opportunity on the basis that they disagree with an individual.
These two events made me think about then and now, and whether a common thread connects them over the span of nearly three decades.
As someone whose profession is opinions and whose mission is, in large part, to provide a forum for diverse views, I have wondered over the years if I did the right thing back in 1974.
I wondered about it then, too.