News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Thinking Out Loud

« Who's a racist? | Main | The cartoon controversy »

This week's column: Merge schmerge

Guilford is Guilford and Greensboro is Greensboro and never the twain shall meet?

The City Council dropped talk of a merger between the Guilford County Sheriff's Department and the Greensboro Police Department faster than you can say "political hot potato" last week. Mayor Keith Holliday, who had broached the topic, says such a notion is "on the table far off into the future." But isn't that the whole idea of long-range planning? To begin, at least, to talk about it now?

Of course, the merger concept has come up many times before. For instance, it surfaced during the county commissioners' retreat in 2003, when then-Commissioner Mike Barber, who now sits on the City Council, suggested a merged metro police force under Sheriff BJ Barnes' supervision. Chief Robert White had just left the Greensboro Police Department for a new job in Louisville, Ky. Now might be a good time to consider a different approach, Barber figured.
Barnes agreed, saying then that he had talked to some members of the City Council, some of whom were receptive. And that was that. No action. No study. No way.

A merger certainly merits more discussion, but so many emotions, personalities and egos are attached that it's tough to do so rationally and objectively.

When the discussion came and went in 2003, an anti-police brutality group protested that Barnes would be the wrong man to head a consolidated police force that would consist of more than 725 officers. The group, which calls itself the October 22nd Coalition, say Barnes was unfit for such a job because of the fatal shooting of a mentally disturbed man, Gilbert Barber, by one of his officers. The group also contended that black residents had little trust or confidence in Barnes.

They are, of course, entitled to their opinions, but by most accounts, Barnes has been a very good sheriff. He'd probably do a fine job supervising a combined agency. But he should have to apply for the job.

The head of a county-city police agency should be appointed, not elected. That ensures a solid professional background in law enforcement and, at least theoretically, makes the position less political.

Yes, the Greensboro Police Department has been embroiled in its controversy in recent months with the resignation of Chief David Wray amid allegations that he abused his power. And yes, this proves bad things can happen even when a police chief is appointed and thoroughly screened by community representatives, as was Wray.

But an appointment process is still preferable to elections and less prone to distraction by partisan politics. And such an important selection requires the same kind of sensitivity, experience and skills that we expect from our judges. And they shouldn't be elected either.

But who and how to select a grand potentate of law enforcement is only one tough question a merger would create.

For instance, is bigger always necessarily better? Police departments depend on trust and good will in their communities to be successful. Smaller departments that focus on smaller communities might be less burdened by bureaucracy and more familiar with the citizens they serve.

And what about economies of scale?

If saving money is the object, it's probably worth noting that Charlotte/Mecklenburg, which has a consolidated city-county police force, has the costliest city government in the state, according to a study by the John Locke Foundation.

The study attributes that greater cost to Charlotte's mass transit tax. But the fiscal implications, as well as the impact on service, certainly deserve a closer look.

They won't get one. At least not anytime soon.

Big ideas like this one come and go around here. They make interesting headlines and editorial fodder. But they can get messy and involved and the political payoff may come years in the future, if it ever comes, so why bother?

What's more, today's City Council could lay the groundwork for such an initiative and some future council with different notions could pull the plug.
Plus, what are the realistic odds of a successful collaboration with the county commissioners?

And what about High Point, which traditionally has resisted efforts to combine anything with Greensboro? Shouldn't it be part of the equation?

So all this merger talk will fade for a few years until someone brings it up again.

And the ritual will repeat, in a dizzying whirl of good intentions headed nowhere.

Much like my perennial plans to clean out my garage. Tomorrow.

Comments (6)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

mrproduce said:

"But an appointment process is still preferable to elections and less prone to distraction by partisan politics."

HORSEFEATHERS! If you actually believe that Allen, I have a wonderful piece of beach property right here at the foot of Saluda Mountain that I will sell you for a good price.

Evidently you haven't been reading the paper or listening to the news lately. Judges (or any officer of the court) being appointed are less likely to be prone to distraction of partisan politics? Hello! Where have you been?
Any time any officer of the court, be it judge, sheriff or other, is appointed it is pure
politics.
Who appoints them? Those in power.How did they get there? Those with the deepest pockets hold the power.

I will agree with you on the idea that the twain shall never merge. Reason, politics, power and money.


RatherBrown said:

It should never happen while Sheriffs exist as elected officials, and let me say I speak from intimate knowledge: my dad was one for several terms. I loved my dad, but I watched the system from the inside, and it changes most people in a negative way. Elections, even by a slim margin, breed egos, and egos too often get in the way. Many a good program of law enforcement cooperation has gone by the wayside because the sheriff insisted on being 'in charge' rather than sharing responsibility with heads of other agencies. And speaking of High Point's reluctance toward any merger of any system...after the County school board's actions toward High Point, who can blame them?

jaycee said:

The Sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer in the county, and has jurisdiction over the entire county; the Greensboro police over only a portion of it.
Common sense (and probably Common Law) dictate that the Sheriff should lead such an agency.

Allen Johnson said:

I disagee, obviously, on how a chief county law enforcement officer ought to be chosen.

I concede, as I did in this week's column, that even the best selection process -- and I believe Greensboro definitely used best practices in the hiring of Chief Wray -- can sometimes result in the wrong selection.

However, a hiring/appointment process, with input from law enforcement professionals, the City Council, the city manager and citizens is clearly preferable to a popularity contest.

This is more a professional position -- a full-time job that requires management skills. If elections were a better way, maybe we should be selecting corporate CEOs by popular vote and promoting our military leaders that way.


Beyond that, I'd love this discussion to continue among city leaders, rather than be squelched before it can hardly begin.

chosen fast said:

"However, a hiring/appointment process, with input from law enforcement professionals, the City Council, the city manager and citizens is clearly preferable to a popularity contest."

Hmmm... Wonder if the beloved BJ could survive such a process? It would be interesting to see how he would fare in a competitive hiring situation against law enforcement professionals interested in running a metro cop shop. Maybe we'll get to find out someday soon. ;)

I'm with you, Allen. I'd prefer an appointed Chief to an elected Sheriff. With no objections to Mr. Barnes applying for the job, of course.

Allen Johnson said:

Chosen Fast:
Absolutely. Again, I have high regard for the sheriff. But this is a system we're talking about, not a referendum on individuals.
Also, Sheriff Barnes tends to be a very political animal, nicknamed Boss Hogg by some in half-jest.
He would need to drop that baggage if he ever headed a consolidated metro department.
Actually, he needs to drop it as sheriff.

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.