News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Thinking Out Loud

« The Jeffus-Rumley dilemma | Main | Graffiti laws »

Keep downtown nightlife safe ... but don’t squeeze the life out of the place

This week's column.

The nightlife scene in downtown Greensboro isn’t so much about who as when.The early crowd is a mixed crew of middle-aged couples and younger singles.

They typically pack the south end of Elm Street to eat and drink at sidewalk cafes where summer breezes keep them cool and a colorful parade of passersby keeps them occupied.
As the sun begins to set and the shadows deepen, a new, younger crew clocks in, just as the older group finishes dessert and begins to head home.

The scent of fresh perfume fills the air and visions of Spandex and stiletto heels fill the sidewalks. Long lines begin to form at club entrances.

Hours later, the crowds grow bigger and louder and a little bit drunker, even as some of us are already home in bed, fast asleep and content that we’ve had a big night out.

Therein lies the promise and the problem in downtown Greensboro. We have gotten what we hoped for: lots of people.

And we don’t quite know what to do with them.

The good news is that, even in the middle of the week, these young people are coming in droves to the center city. The bad news is that the crowds are so huge that they threaten to overwhelm the ability of police and security to handle it all.

Downtown Greensboro Inc. President Ed Wolverton broached the issue during a recent visit to the News & Record. A local businessman, Rocco Scarfone, is battling the city over an ordinance that limits the hours of sidewalk dining and Wolverton wanted to weigh in. Some say the ordinance is too restrictive. Others say it ensures the safety of diners and pedestrians downtown, as the crowds spill out of clubs onto the streets.

The ordinance allows sidewalk dining from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays, and from 11 a.m.-midnight on Fridays, Saturdays and holidays.

But the issue is much bigger than that.

A police video depicts some of the problems those crowds can pose: traffic, litter, loitering, obstacles to emergency personnel getting where they need to be in case of a crime or injury. On a Wednesday. “Sidewalk dining is not the problem,” Wolverton said. “The problem is that we have 2,500 people jammed into a one-block area at 2 a.m.”

And the trick is for city leaders to address those challenges without squeezing the life out of the place. Remember, this is a problem we wanted.

“You want to manage the crowd,” Wolverton said, “but you don’t want to stifle it.”

One longer-range solution is a lesson city leaders learned on a tour of Greenville, S.C.’s, very successful center city: the value of wider sidewalks for walking and dining. Another is creating a club district in future downtown planning to create buffers between noisy-by-nature nightclubs and residences.

Other possible solutions:

Add police. Charlotte helps stretch resources by pairing new police academy graduates with veteran officers. Charlotte merchants help pay for it through money raised through special downtown tax districts.

Put police on horseback. An idea that won’t die keeps galloping into the discussion. Mounted police certainly could help manage large crowds, and the concept still is being mulled by police and city leaders.

Crack down on loitering. In downtown Baltimore, police won’t let you stand in one spot for more than five seconds. Or so it seems. But would we want that here?

Close downtown — or parts of it, at certain hours. Some cities set curfews for entertainment districts, but that could prove counterproductive in Greensboro. After working so hard to build traffic downtown, why shut it down?

Restrict traffic on some streets to only pedestrians. This has been done successfully in many cities, including Greensboro. The New York Times reports success there in opening some streets only to foot traffic on weekends. Mused a New York Times editorial: “Without honking horns and speeding taxis, the streets have become serene parks, open to throngs of cyclists, inline skaters and strollers.”

Don’t expect a “serene park” on South Elm, even on a weeknight. But closing off traffic could ease crowding, soothe tempers and increase safety.

Make club owners more responsible for security. Require that clubs of certain sizes hire off-duty police officers. It seems only reasonable that they bear part of the responsibility.
As a center-city resident himself, Wolverton is fully aware of our dilemma. “Downtown is “invigorating,” he says of the new attitude there. The center city’s image as a place where good times come to shrivel up and die is history.

The question is how we choose to handle too much of this good thing. With wit and creativity or with heavy hands and overkill?

Comments (8)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

Jonathan51 said:

I like the idea of marking off a 2-block or so area around Elm Street to pedestrian and bicycle traffic only, say after 7 or 8 p.m., which would definitely attract more business and ensure the safety of restaurant and bar customers downtown. Why must city leaders penalize the strolling customers, who are simply doing the best they can to enjoy themselves within a tight limited space where cars, other vehicles, and other pedestrians are competing against one another? Cars already rule the Gate City, and I believe that officials need to think out of the box for a change, and stop punishing enterprising business owners whose operations are definitely stimulating growth downtown. Most of the biggest cities are used to heavy downtown pedestrian traffic on their streets late at night, so crowded sidewalks would be a minor thing for them! Let's get creative here: Restrict motorized traffic through the heaviest streets after daytime business hours, put up a few barricades, allow the walkers, bicyclists, and skaters to roam free, and watch Downtown Greensboro create new energy and revenues!

Allen Johnson said:

Thanks for your comments, Johnathan. I agree. Some cities (or businesses) even provide extra personnel (not police officers) to help manage traffic. Friendly Center does that during Christmas season.

Ta said:

I feel like the loitering and the other problems come from people that know they aren't welcome or will not be allowed in the clubs. Everytime that I come back to Greensboro, my friends and I want to go out to the club but it seems like we end up going downtown and hanging out because we aren't allowed to get into certain clubs. We are always at the house getting ready to go out, and spending time making sure that our jeans aren't too baggy or that we have on the right shoes. Then when we reach the club we are told that our pants are too baggy EVERYTIME. It would be a great idea to block off the traffic because most of the people are coming downtown to go to the club but end up "posting up" instead.

Allen Johnson said:

I have heard that complaint more than once, but if the dress code is enforced consistently, they're entitled, aren't they?
But if it isn't, there's a problem. Definitely.

Allen Johnson said:

I have heard that complaint more than once, but if the dress code is enforced consistently, they're entitled, aren't they?
But if it isn't, there's a problem. Definitely.

Ta said:

That is a valid complaint, because I truly feel that the people at the club are USING the dress code to target who they want in the club. Me and my friends truly dress nice. My fraternity is stereotyped for being "pretty boys." We can sit and watch someone go into the club before and after us with baggy jeans and we are constantly told that our pants are too baggy. The last time that I was in town the bouncer came to us as we were just getting in the line to tell us our pants were too baggy and that we could not get into the club toningt. We had on slacks that night. I would really appreciate it if you could possibly do a story on this topic and see the responses.

Allen Johnson said:

So, let's be clear here. Who is it they don't want in certain clubs, as you see it?

Ta said:

Sorry that I have not been able to respond in a while. But in response to your last question, I feel like the clubs are indirectly trying to target the urban customer. Dress code states: No Timberland Boots, No Fitted Hats, No White T-Shirts, No Baggy Jeans. Now that they have this dress code in place and I respect your dress code and conform to your club's dress code. Why am I still denied access in. You tell me who this dress code is made to keep out.

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.