An irate caller phoned Monday. The woman, an African American, wasn't so sure Barack Obama can call himself the same. Or whether the rest of us should, either.
An African American is someone who is descended from American slaves from Africa, she said. Obama does not qualify.
And she was pretty worked up about it.
A series of letters to the editor have argued that point as well. One of the more recent letters contended that Obama arguably has a bigger claim to the term "African American" than other Americans of color.
Still others have disagreed that Obama isn't the first black president. He is "bi-racial," since his mother was white and his father was Kenyan.
This bothers me a little, as if it gives some people the license to say, "Well he's like Tiger Woods ... not a regular, garden-variety black person. So he's OK "
Hold on. This gets curiouser.
Philip van Lidth de Jeude of Carrboro writes: "Although his mother was ... a Caucasian woman originally from Kansas, his father was a foreign student from Kenya, which is a country in Africa. Thus, if the truth be known, he is more truly an African American than most of those in this country designated with that term.
"Considering that the ancestors of most African Americans lived in the United States for at least a couple of generations, there isn’t very much about them that is African except the origin of some distant ancestors. And if the truth be known, most of them are multi-racial, as we define the term, as there is practically no one in that ethnic group who doesn’t have some admixture of Caucasian, Native American or some other ethnic group."
On his last point, especially, I agree. All you have to do is look around to see how many hues black folks come in. In the racial parlance of apartheid South Africa, many, if not most of us would be considered "colored."
Some states wrangled with definitions by passing laws that decreed racial fractions. If you were such and such percentage of one race or another, that's determined how you were classified.
That, of course, led to some people being considered one race in one state and a different race in another.
The norm I grew up with was much simpler: If your physiology contained even the teeniest fraction of "black" blood, then you were black. Period.
Whiteness was purity. Blackness was, well, everything else.
That's why it was possible for a black person to have a lighter complexion than a white person. Some people in the black community (which has its own hangups about color) derisively described these folks as "high yellow."
And it's why some black people actually "passed" as white in the days of segregation. (See the melodramatic old weepie, "Imitation of Life.")
Then, of course you could really split hairs and point out that a white immigrant from Africa could be as accurately called an African American as anyone else.
Color me exasperated.
As for what the point is of all this debating back and forth, I am not sure.
Is Obama the first bi-racial president?
Is he the first black president?
Is he the first African American president?
I'd vote for all of the above.
But I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
One thing I am certain of: No one who looks like him has ever before occupied the Oval Office.
Let's just say he is the first person of color to be president.
And call it a day.
.