Nelson Johnson and David Wray: Teammates?
I agree with Ed Cone:
If City Council members Trudy Wade and Mike Barber are serious about the idea they floated Friday about establishing a police review board in Greensboro — with subpoena power — it could make for some downright bizarre bedfellows.
During a news conference, Wade and Barber rattled off a long list of proposals.
But their review board idea stood out. It is an idea that has been pushed and pushed against for years now, primarily in the African American community.
The death of an emotionally disturbed African American man, Daryl Howerton, sparked a review board campaign several years ago.
Two officers fatally shot Howerton, 20, as he was waving a knife, in a tense standoff on Phillips Avenue in 1994.
Howerton had refused repeated police requests to put down the knife.
The case became a rallying cry from the Rev. Nelson Johnson and others. They said it provided positive proof that the city needed a review board because of deep-seeded distrust of police in the black community.
Now the idea is sparked by the ouster of former Police Chief David Wray, who has filed a lawsuit alleging that he was forced to resign because he is white.
The city’s Human Relations Commission already operates a Citizen Complaint Review Board, but critics say it is neither independent nor tough enough.
The Pulpit Forum and Wray supporters may find themselves on the same team -- not to mention the Truth and Reconciliation folks as well..
If these groups agree that a common goal outweighs their obvious differences, the review board idea could gain more traction than ever before.
And David Wray and Nelson Johnson could become ... hermanos?
Comments (18)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
The facts surrounding the Howerton shooting (which do not appear in your article) paint a different picture. You have the facts at hand, I don't need to remind you that how you portray the incident will affect how those who may not even have been out of diapers when this tragedy occurred reply to your post.
If the citizens want a Police Review Board, then so be it. GPD officers, acting in the line of duty, have shown remarkable restraint when force has been necessary.
Then again, the officers were officially cleared.
Posted on January 19, 2009 8:45 PM
I think David Wray may just be practicing the old adage "if you can't beat em, join 'em". Whether you're talking real estate or race scams, when you have a TREBIC / Race agenda-dominated council/ mayor/ mgr. axis it's all about the Benjamins. Whether you're talking C-Dry or EEOC...
PEEPS JUST GOTSTA GET PAID!
Nelson on the other hand may have been acting on principle alone, so hats off to him.
Posted on January 20, 2009 9:37 AM
Still I wonder, Savage: You live in High Point. Why does the GPD issue resonate so strongly with you?
Posted on January 20, 2009 11:37 AM
Howerton was a stark raving lunatic, nude at noon in a populated area attacking people with a butcher knife. The police officers, neither of whom was WHITE, used deadly force as a last resort to prevent citizens from being killed or gravely wounded. Lives were saved that day by two brave officers who faced death to protect our citizens.
Why does the N&R have to misrepresent, twist, and distort everything in a racial slant? Why can't you guys just tell the truth without bias?
Didn't you learn anything about telling the truth when it comes to the GPD in the wake of the Lorraine Ahearn crucifixion of Chief Wray?
Posted on January 20, 2009 12:37 PM
JC, what twisting about the Howerton incident do you refer to? I believe the police did the right thing in that case. Howerton was a threat to himself, the officers and innocent bystanders.
And he was clearly not in a rational frame of mind.
Posted on January 20, 2009 12:52 PM
Because it doesn't seem to with you, Allen. So people try and fill the vacum.
Posted on January 20, 2009 4:03 PM
Savage:
It's a big deal with me ... an important issue. But it does not consume me.
There are hours of the day when I'm actually not t thinking about it.
Posted on January 20, 2009 4:18 PM
Rest assured, that's quite apparent, Allen.
If you can show me a single incidence where you expressed even a modicum of concern or reservation/ trepidation or been cautionary or challenging in the least re: EEOC suits, the record disposal hoax, Mitch's actions in handling the Wray affair, the shifting realities and outright dishonesty re multiple subjects, record requests etc., show me. Please show me!
If I remember right, you did question the "non-hiring freeze hiring freeze".
If you can show me where you took council members to task for making outrageous statements, gems like: "it doesn't matter how we pay for things, we might not be alive tomorrow" or "it doesn't matter if we paid more for a property than it's appraised value because the city always does it this way".
At no time did the N&R persue any of these subjects with the passion and fervor that was evident in the original Wray series. What's good for the goose has to be good for the gander or else people are going to write you off as an agenda drive agit/prop rag.
Allen, people are trying to help you. Do you think this is fun?
Posted on January 20, 2009 10:20 PM
Savage:
You and I go round and round on this.
We have compiled an archive on all the Wray coverage.
You can have a look yourself. I, frankly, don't have time to dig into our archives every time you pull an allegation out of the air without yourself first checking to see if it holds water.
Help yourself. Then we can talk.
I'll post the link to the archive when I get to work later this morning.
As for your status as someone who neither relies on Greensboro police for protection nor pays taxes here, I still am amazed by your interest in the city's affairs.
Posted on January 21, 2009 6:10 AM
Allen -
I think you have the impression that the relatively small group of people who continue to bring up issues like the GPD/Wray issue, Mitch Johnson, Pulpit forum, Hinson & Fulmore, etc are the only people in town who feel so strongly about these issues.
I am sure that's not the case.
I believe the majority, though largely silent, think exactly the same way people like Skeet, Guarino, Spag and others do and I thank them for keeping the pressure on and keeping these issues in the light.
I am disgusted with the way Wray was treated and strongly believe that your paper, and one reporter in particular, created that whole mess. I am sickened by the current state of GPD which allows bad cops to remain on staff. I believe Mitch Johnson is in way over his head and should have been terminated a long time ago. I am mystified at the way your paper, and the city of Greensboro, pander to one race of people on any and all political issues. I am angry at the way one demographic is allowed to rob people and businesses in this area without the local leaders of that demographic uttering a word on the issue.
I've lived here 30 years now and i can tell you that Greensboro is a complete mess right now and the only light at the end of the tunnel appears to be a train.
Posted on January 21, 2009 8:39 AM
Allen,
I, too, am not a resident of Greensboro - I lived several hundred yards outside of the city, but I shop, dine, and in general, spend nearly all of my waking hours in Greensboro.
Just because I don't pay Greensboro city taxes doesn't mean I don't have a vested interest in the manner in which the police department and city are governed.
I expect an excellent police force to protect me when I am within Greensboro city limits - should I expect less because I'm not a resident?
Posted on January 21, 2009 9:00 AM
Allen, show me an editorial where you even gently castigated any of the above mentioned characters? I'm not talking about straight reportage.
Allen, it is funny why you would take a provincial view of why somebody can't have an interest in a race-railroad issue who deosn't live in G-Boro?
Pre-occupation with people's idenities and where they live is a weak, last ditch effort to impugn what they are saying that you and JR employ ad-infinitum when you can't impugn what they are saying any other way.
On a more practical note, is the latest G-Boro police officer arrested for an assualt on a woman inthe paper today a signatory of the EEOC complaint? Looks like there was a similar name listed? Not that that would be relevant, of course.
Posted on January 21, 2009 10:06 AM
I just provided a link to the archived coverage in a new post.
Posted on January 21, 2009 10:21 AM
Again, Allen, I was kind of talking about editorials. Like above, about the protest petition, where you take a firm position. That's what we're talking about. Thanks for providing the link.
ie: To this day, i don't have any idea of what you think about the latter revelations about the black book. Mitches flip/flop on the black book, the EEOC, the record disposal hoax, council members saying nothing matters because we're going to die, and on an on and on. Your silence gives the appearence that you either aren't interested or are biased.
Posted on January 21, 2009 11:08 AM
As for your status as someone who neither relies on Greensboro police for protection nor pays taxes here, I still am amazed by your interest in the city's affairs.
***********
Allen, I remember you having a real rooting interest in the dreaded High Point school choice plan a few years back. But you don't live in High Point, do you?
But Anonymous is right. Police protection isn't a strictly provincial issue. Many people who don't live in Greensboro proper still work, shop and/or dine in in the city on a regular basis and, thus, are directly affected by the quality of police service in Greensboro.
Posted on January 21, 2009 12:05 PM
That is true. I don't live in High Point. Never have.
But a significant chunk of our readers do live in High Point. We feel an obligation to write and report for them, too.
In addition, a member of our editorial board, who contributes to discussions and editorials about High Point, does live there.
Another was managing editor of the High Point Enterprise for years.
Posted on January 21, 2009 12:21 PM
And that's fine - I'm glad you do write about High Point. But why knock Savage (or anyone else) for taking an interest in Greensboro affairs?
That was my whole point, not that the N&R should or shouldn't write about High Point issues.
Posted on January 21, 2009 12:53 PM
Allen Johnson grew up across the street from the Phillips Avenue TVGrill. He knows better than anyone, young Howerton dropped out of college to become a PCP-crack head. Parents(Barber-Howerton) cannot accept their sons became, not their little lambs, but dangerous destroyers while on PCP or CRACK. Rev. Nelson Johnson makes hay out of solving socal ills. Nelson needs to stop crack and tell the truth. Christine
Posted on January 21, 2009 4:34 PM