News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

The Inside Scoop

« Bill Agapion and Arco Realty | Main | Council to GCTV: You've got 3 years to shape up »

Retreat!

Some of you may have read this article and wondered why the commissioners retreat is such a big deal. What are they retreating from anyway?

The party-line government wonk answer goes something like: A retreat is an opportunity for the board, particularly one with many new members, to get to know one another and set policies and priorities for the upcoming year.

Here on earth, the real answer is much more mundane: The retreat is the commissioners' first swipe at shaping the annual budget.

The annual county budget totals nearly a half-billion dollars and provides for everything from public schools to the health and sheriff's departments to paying for elections.

Although the commissioners only directly work on their budget for about seven weeks in May and June, preparations begin much earlier.

In many governments, Greensboro for example, initial budget briefings often happen in December, a full five or six months before the manager presents his recommended budget to the legislative group.

So in theory, the commissioners' retreat would be a chance to give directions to the budget staff like "put more money towards X" or "We don't think Y should be so much of a priority."

Why might Chairman Bruce Davis think a road trip to Chapel Hill might be in order for the commissioners' annual retreat? Well, it seems recent retreats have been less about budget priorities and more about who could get off the best one liner.

Want evidence? Fine. Scoop is reaching back into our greatest hits file to bring you a classic story from Alex Wayne, who covered the county commissioners' retreat last year. (Click the continue link for the story.) Enjoy.

DATE: Sunday, January 25, 2004
HEADLINE: BOARD CLASHES ON JAIL, GUNS

GREENSBORO - The Guilford County commissioners spent much of a Saturday morning meeting arguing, foreshadowing what could be a testy year for their board.

In between making their policy on incentives for new businesses more generous and declining to have a citizens committee study the county's ordinance on firing guns, quarrels dominated the commissioners' annual retreat.

They argued about bonds. They argued about whether to study building a new jail. They argued about giving minority-owned businesses more opportunities to win county contracts. They argued about each other.

The meeting is traditionally where the commissioners set budget priorities for the year. This year, they could face the usual hard decisions about the county's budget against the backdrop of an election that could change the political complexion of their board.

The commissioners' first debate of the morning involved a $300,000 study of the county's jail and courthouse needs.

It is intended to determine how the county can reduce crowding in its two jails, and whether a new jail or jail/courthouse complex is needed, where to build it and how. But many commissioners believe it is a foregone conclusion that the study will recommend building an expensive new jail, a project Sheriff BJ Barnes has pushed for years.

Some Democratic commissioners believe that the county should first try to reduce the populations of the existing jails, primarily by not detaining people charged with minor crimes such as drug possession.

"If BJ Barnes, our sheriff, has anything to do with this study, I think the bottom line is, we're going to build a new jail in his honor," Commissioner Melvin "Skip" Alston, a Democrat, declared after Maj. Deborah Montgomery's presentation on the study.

"We're all about doing what's right for Guilford County," Montgomery retorted.

Commissioner Billy Yow, a Republican and close ally of Barnes', started arguing that inmates are in the jails because of judges' decisions.

Steve Hayes, a trainer in the county's Social Services Department whom County Manager Willie Best had brought to the meeting as one of two "facilitators" for the commissioners, rose to intervene. Commissioners Chairman Bob Landreth waved him off.

Neither facilitator was heard from again.

The commissioners next debated economic development incentives, a subject of much interest this month. Two companies are expected soon to request grants of tax dollars from the commissioners in exchange for new factories and offices that could employ 1,300.

In preparation for those requests, the county's business recruiters want the commissioners to make their policy on incentives more generous. The county's Community Development Department director, Rob Bencini, outlined the new policy Saturday.

Until now, the commissioners could opt to pay companies up to $1,000 per job created, if the jobs pay wages 15 percent higher than the county average or better.

The new policy would apply only when the county's unemployment rate is 4.5 percent or higher. It would allow the commissioners to pay $2,000 per job for the first 100 jobs and $1,000 per job thereafter. In addition, the jobs would have to pay just 90 percent of the county's average wage.

Yow argued that the new policy would reward companies for creating jobs that might not necessarily go to Guilford County citizens. Commissioner Steve Arnold, a Republican, argued that "people and private enterprise are the best economic development engines we have," not incentives.

The commissioners voted 9-2 to adopt the new policy.

Next, discussion of a proposed $20 million parks bond raised Alston's ire. He has criticized the bond for, among other reasons, including
$1.5 million for an athletics complex north of High Point proposed by developer Ed Price.

Though Bencini and the leaders of the county's Parks and Recreation Commission and Open Space Committee attended Saturday's meeting to brief the commissioners on the bond, Wade moved to postpone discussion of the issue because Price was not present.

Alston objected. "We need to go ahead and discuss the bonds, and stop trying to delay so you can build support for this one project," he said.

Wade insisted the commissioners vote on her motion to postpone the discussion and told commissioners Vice Chairwoman Carolyn Coleman, who was leading the meeting in Landreth's temporary absence, that she wanted to "call the question," or end debate.

Coleman tried to call for a vote, but Alston argued, correctly, that "calling the question" was a motion that required a second and its own vote. "I've got more debate," he said.

"I will have order, Mr. Alston," Coleman warned him. "We're going to vote to cut off Mr. Alston's debate," she announced, drawing laughs.

"For how many months, Ms. Chairman?" asked Commissioner Mike Barber.

The commissioners voted 7-4 to postpone discussion of the bond, but Alston continued to argue.

"Mr. Alston, respect us! Am I going to have to remove you from the house?" Coleman said, with the slightest of smiles.

"Ain't got anyone big enough in the county to do that," Alston muttered. "Or bad enough."

The parks officials were allowed to speak briefly; they all generally said that the commissioners should allow citizens to vote on the bond. Later, two other proposals failed.

Barber proposed that the commissioners appoint a committee of homeowners, hunters and law enforcement officials to study revising the county's ordinance on firing weapons in public.

The issue created controversy recently after a county resident asked the commissioners to increase limits on firing weapons.

Barber said that Yow, who has opposed any change in the ordinance, had agreed earlier this week to create the citizens committee. But on Saturday, Yow voted against it.

"You suggested the committee!" Barber yelled at Yow after his proposal failed 5-6.

Moments later, Barber cocked his fingers like a pistol, pointed at Yow and whispered: "Pow!" Yow shrugged.

Then Yow proposed to split the Community Development Department in two.

Under Yow's proposal, a planning department would be created, headed by a licensed planning director, to handle land-use issues, and building inspections and permitting. Bencini has no experience in planning and defers to his employees who do.

Yow would have Bencini continue to lead a "community services" department, which would handle issues such as economic development, parks, and water and sewer-line extensions.

Yow's effort to have Best study the idea failed by a 6-5 vote.

The commissioners ended by agreeing that Best should bring them two proposed 2004-05 budgets in May, one with no net increase in the county's property-tax levy and one with increases for what Landreth called "basic necessities."

Comments (2)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

I've always wondered why they don't have an annual 'advance'.

Mark Binker said:

Hmmm...maybe instead of changing the location they could just change the name?

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

Explore This Blog

Contact Scoop

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.