Live-blogging the City Council meeting
UPDATE (4:19 p.m.): The council voted 7-2 (Rakestraw and Wade against) to direct the city manager to address the following issues: Issues in the fire department, Parks and Recreation Department and the communications department; reorganize the manager's office; have clear, consistent communication with the council; work on his delegation skills. Mike Barber made the motion; T. Dianne Bellamy-Small gave the second.
Before that, however, Robbie Perkins moved that Johnson be retained; Goldie Wells was the second. Then Mary Rakestraw moved that the manager be removed; Wade provided the second.
Barber's motion, however, was the last one given, and the one the council had to vote on.
Then the council returned to closed session to discuss personnel issues and some legal cases. To be continued.
UPDATE (4:12 p.m.): They just got back in. Jim Collins, who runs Channel 13 for the city, just popped in to say that they're having trouble with the streaming video online video because "the site is overloaded." Hope you can watch, but I'll update as necessary.
UPDATE (2:22 p.m.): A couple of people worth noting out here waiting with the media types: former Mayor Keith Holliday; Locke Clifford, attorney for David Wray; Cyndy Hayworth, who ran for the District 3 seat on the City Council now occupied by Zack Matheny; and Richard O'Brien, who heads the local firefighters union..
Well, it's not really live blogging. The council immediately went into a closed session to discuss Mitch Johnson's future.
I expect them to sit back there for a long time. I'll update when I can, though.
Comments (34)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
Tell the channel 13 people their streaming is freezing and it aint working
Posted on February 14, 2008 3:05 PM
Margaret,
I too would have been there, but got the call that it would be a quick "into closed session" so I thought I'd wait.
It seems there are enough votes to Keep Mitch, as only Rakestraw, Wade are after blood.
Amazing how the County Commissioners are now civil and operating like a well oiled machine, while the "former commissioners" are making a mockery of our city council. My hope is that Mike Barber will shake off his protracted sleep and see this for what it really is--vengence. Wade and Rakestraw have joined up together to turn the council into a circus like they did over on the Commissioners--there has to be turmoil for those two, as that's what they live for.
Posted on February 14, 2008 3:24 PM
John Graham, as opposed to what?
The previous bobble heads that put us into this position to begin with?
Your attempt to blame Wade and Rakestraw for a previous council's inability to make the tough decisions and lead are laughable.
But they sure were nice people weren't they?
Posted on February 14, 2008 3:38 PM
Yeah John Graham, sure wouldn't want anything like "vengeance" playing a role in the Wray/Johnson affair.
Posted on February 14, 2008 3:46 PM
John Graham:
Locking the chief out of his office, leaking reports and lie detector tests are examples of fine leadership?
Posted on February 14, 2008 3:52 PM
If the reason information has not been made public is because law enforcement says that it is classified or otherwise protected, and documents end up on certain local blogs, exactly who is doing the "leaking?"
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:00 PM
jw
The trouble is, is that when "law enforcement says that it is classified or otherwise protected" we don't believe them.
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:19 PM
Margaret,
Any info on what "issues in the Parks & Recreation Department" are in need of "addressing".
The P&R Commission met yesterday and no "issues" came up even though a city mgr and a city council person were in attendance.
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:43 PM
While we're asking questions of Mitch Johnson, how about the screw up of the water bills? According to WFMY, seems the bills are all incorrect and new ones will have to be prepared. How much is that costing the taxpayers? I'm not an IT person, but I know enough to check out major changes in a billing system before I turn it loose.
I know Johnson didn't do it himself, but it happened on his watch. If he expects to be top dog he needs to know what his puppies are doing.
MD
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:45 PM
John Graham...the same John Graham that had a letter to the editor printed today supporting Mitch Johnson? The same John Graham that works with Zach Matheney at A.G.Edwards and shares an office with same. What timing ...or coincidence of your sudden participation in the dialogue.
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:49 PM
David, they did NOT specify which issues in P&R, and that will be one of the first questions I ask. They immediately went back into closed session, so there was no time to ask.
Posted on February 14, 2008 4:53 PM
And what issues in the Commuications Department? is there even a "communications department"?? It's not listed on the city's website. Seems to me that all the communications issues have been the result of an unwillingness to communicate on the part of the Legal department and the police department, not the city's communications folks.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:08 PM
Margaret,
Are they still in closed session. Makes everyone feel warm and fuzzy on Valentines Day.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:10 PM
No matter what occurred this afternoon at the city manager meeting, no way should an employee of a board be seated with the board at all times. Please remove M Johnson from sitting with council. Thank you.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:14 PM
Tommy, yep, they're still back there. Don't know what it's like in that room, but in this nearly empty council chambers, it is about as far from "warm" as you can get. John Hammer actually has icicles on his beard.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:17 PM
Margaret,
Do you and John want a smoothie or something to eat.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:24 PM
What a nice offer! But my guess is we won't be here that much longer. I hope.
Posted on February 14, 2008 5:29 PM
The circus continues -
Posted on February 14, 2008 6:35 PM
What a nebulous list of directives for Mitch Johnson. The Council should have directed Johnson to:
-come clean on "Memogate." What did he know about the memos regarding the black book and when did he know it? What was he trying to cover up?
-demand accountability. Johnson locked Wray out of his office and then forced his recognition because he "lost trust in him." Johnson's behavior regarding Memogate is no less untrustworthy.
-Finally, give Johnson a clear set of metrics for him to meet as city manager. If he fails to meet the requirements, he loses his job.
John Graham, your ignorance is as apparent as your naivete.
Posted on February 14, 2008 7:08 PM
Can anyone explain the reasoning behind making the most powerful person in city government unelected and unable to be recalled? There seems to be something undemocratic about that. We stopped the indirect election of the president, why not the manager?
Posted on February 14, 2008 9:01 PM
Aaron, you're correct about being unable to remove the manager by recall election. But it is my understanding that he can be removed by referendum petition.
Be assured that certain active community leaders are discussing options.
Billy Jones has a great comment over at Ed's blog. He says the council voted today to tell the manager to do his job.
Posted on February 14, 2008 9:23 PM
Ms Banks, Mike Barber an attorney, must do a lot of the cities work by the way he talks.
"our city manager is a husband and deserves respect and professionalism in how we make our decision." Is the city of Greensboro a backwards city, or does Barber think people in Greensboro are stupid and can not read between the lines. What do you think about Chief Wrays life as a husband. Oh, Chief Wray is just a city employee, the council and city mgr. does not take that to be important and he does not deserves "respect and professionalism' Something is not even on my scale.
Posted on February 14, 2008 10:04 PM
Ms Banks, Mike Barber an attorney, must do a lot of the cities work by the way he talks.
"our city manager is a husband and deserves respect and professionalism in how we make our decision." Is the city of Greensboro a backwards city, or does Barber think people in Greensboro are stupid and can not read between the lines. What do you think about Chief Wrays life as a husband. Oh, Chief Wray is just a city employee, the council and city mgr. does not take that to be important and he does not deserves "respect and professionalism' Something is not even on my scale.
Posted on February 14, 2008 10:05 PM
Margaret, Please suggest to Channel 13 to post the actual time somewhere on the screen. I hope I don't keep flipping back over there just to see today's rerun of "Council In Closed Session."
Posted on February 14, 2008 10:27 PM
I believe we do need to look at parks and rec.
I believe that if this dept had been looked at before we would not have lost has many kids
to gangs has we have. They don't care about our youths and that is not right. I happen to know first hand they just love their nice paying
jobs with no work.
Posted on February 15, 2008 1:12 PM
I believe we do need to look at parks and rec.
I believe that if this dept had been looked at before we would not have lost has many kids
to gangs has we have. They don't care about our youths and that is not right. I happen to know first hand they just love their nice paying
jobs with no work.
Posted on February 15, 2008 1:13 PM
Perry, your're right about Mike Barber's collusioin with the city manager's job. He has no ethics since he believes that when someone doesn't like the truth and the heat is on, then you rule against the truth and use the excuse that the law can be broken. He's one of Hatfield's patsies in that they buy off every attorney and judge using the criminal abuse of justice thru the city police department to cover up their crimes of fraud by extortion.
Why hasn't Wray's attorney, Locke Clifford gone to court with his client? He already knows he won't get a fair hearing or due process for his client or much less Scott Sanders by his attorney.
Test the waters and see if that isn't a fact. I know, Mike Barber told me last year to my face that when your're not liked, then there is no justice. Seems to me, he reminds me of the thug representative in Raleigh, Tom Wright who has committed fraud, obstruction of justice, and would you know, uses a Greensboro Attorney who the judge cares less about. It may be 128 years since a public official was removed from office (Mitch Johnson), but he has not ethics and if a true investigation of his lies and deceit were allowed to be made public, he would be found guilty, like Geddy's (poor soul trying to get out of prison) by violating a federal law that makes it a federal crime by a public official (Mitch Johnson, the police department 's dirty cop, and the police chief, along with the judge who likes cop killers that strike out at police officers) as well as Mike Barber, a crime to deny or deprive the public of honest services. I'm sorry that the only two city council members who know the truth were unable to bring the truth out. As I see it, the meeting wasn't about making Mitch (who should have been pitched to the landfill) answer to his obstruction of justice to keep his job. Wasn't that what the closed meeting was to be about? I thought there was a community meeting with the Mayor over the other issues that did not relate to the matter that has been in the paper to be decided. Maybe I misread the bs by the paper in that it mixed prunes with apples and oranges to dance around the problem involving the city manager since prunes don't do anything except let the poop out if enough are eaten.
The county commissioners don't do anything as they should since the excuse for their corruption and cover up, as addressed by the Rhino Times in 2003 about the cover up by Churchill's clerk's by a certain attorney (Kitty Hatfield) in the High Point Clerk of Court's Office. Oh, now you have to call the county attorney. Where was the city attorney at this so called meeting. Bet he's bought by the Hatfield's as they bought off of my attorneys with threats of disbarment if they did not do what they were told to do by the Hatfield's. Even Allen Johnson brought out this fact in his editorial in August 2001 when he stated that Bill Daisy (remember him and his sexual harassment and being bought by Kitty Hatfield in my case along with Joe Turner and all judges involved in her cases) that if the judges did not do what a certain attorney wanted them to do in order to when her cases, regardless of the truth or the law, that lawyer would turn on them with dirty antics. Oh well, I say that anyone who thinks they know the truth, which I haven't read, except in Trudy and Mary, then maybe you should see for yourself how the judges are manipulated by the Hatfield's. I have the evidence even when my own attorneys brought out that the Hatfield's are not Gingis Kong and they abuse the criminal process to vent their hate crimes which is against the law.
Well, what you didn't do right, Mike Barber, I'll do in my federal lawsuit against the city of Greensboro and its corrupt police department as well as its attorneys and county departments that aid and abet crimes by pedophiles and corrupt attorneys who need to be disbarred for the same Nifong crimes of stupidity.
Boy that was a waste of time for that meeting. Why didn't you state what the agenda was after all of the BS in the paper about Mitch. Like cockroaches in the dark, that when you turn the light on they go running to the dark places. Will somebody turn the lights on PLEASE!!!!!
Posted on February 15, 2008 1:39 PM
Margaret, thanks for your excellent reporting over the past several days. I look forward to more from you in coming weeks and months.
Posted on February 15, 2008 2:50 PM
Rebecca, please tell us how you really feel.
Posted on February 15, 2008 4:36 PM
Ray said about the P&R Department... "They don't care about our youths..."
That is total BS. Either you don't know what you are talking about or you just like to throw bombs.
The P&R Dept is leading the way in gang prevention. Several initiatives have been under way for years to bring more kids to our Rec Centers. In the last year, several additional steps have been taken including working with the police dept. to help identify kids who are at risk and involve them with recreation programs and to match them with mentors.. The dept has applied for a huge state grant to augment their current "scholorship" program to bring even more kids into the fold.
It might be a good idea to get involved and help instead of sniping from the sidelines.
Posted on February 15, 2008 4:58 PM
Tony, don't you get the message. How I feel is that the City of Greensboro at the manipulation by a drug infested police force used to obstruct a financial fraud crime by the Hatfield's has my son's life in danger by his pedophile father as well as the violation and fraud of my family in a case that never had any jurisdiction. I know what police brutality is all about when the Hatfield's are involved in everything within the city, control of the court, the judges who have to rule upon the lives of human beings destroyed by the corruption involving the GPD. I have a family and son being destroyed by the lies and deceit by being blamed for something I haven't done, but yet, being told by Mike Barber, if your're not liked, then justice is not to be had. Greensboro is controlled by corrupt BS and an attorney who too answers to the Hatfield's as does Lock Clifford and Seth Cohen, both representing officers who were doing their job and exposed the very dirty cop that the Hatfield's use to obstruct justice in a fraud investigation by the "local law enforcement of Greensboro since the crime is still ongoing in Greensboro by the Hatfield's and my ex pedophile husband kidnapping and sodomizing and abusing my son on a daily basis while, like the police department blaming their incompetence on someone else to take the blame.
It seems to me if the Rhino Times can expose the BS that your paper covers up with their incompetencies of lies and deceit and lack of knowledge, then why keep a city manager who doesn't know the truth or does nothing about the corruption. It's still there. Appears to me that your so called short in closet meeting about Mitch had nothing to do about the standards of his conduct and goals and corruption to be addressed. Seems to me you know nothing of the laws that protect the public from the corruption of public officials who are bought by attorneys, not by the public. Mitch is as sorry as the crap up next to go to prison in Raleigh, Mr. Tom Wright, like Geddy's, Black, and Decker are thugs who violate a federal law and are criminals in that their own actions violate the right to honest services due the public. Where do you stand when you want to know how I feel. If you are a loser, as the Hatfield's are, since they do everything dishonestly and then punish others for their crimes without due process. If you have to obstruct the truth and act like cockroaches running lose in the dark and you turn on the light switch, you see they run to the dark because they can't face the light with their filth and incompetence. I know, Kitty couldn't face me when my attorney, brother to the last thug in Raleigh - Tom Wright, addressed the financial fraud by Kitty and Jack, but yet like all the judges and attorneys in Greensboro and the ones I hired out of county that were federal attorneys, were bought over by collusion and threats of disbarment if they exposed their crimes at the direction of Judge Turner cop killer lover. I know they used the police department and their dirty cop in the presence of Scott Sanders in April 2005 to threaten my life and to obstruct justice. I have a son that has been obstructed, along with all witnesses since my ex placed an illegal 50B Order on me that disseminates into the law enforcement agencies to set up an illegal arrest to draw a falsified arrest and incarceration to cover up the crimes that are not mine. If there is nothing to hide by the attorney, Mr. Don Vaughn who called it what is was in September 2001 when Kitty brought him into play and he was a public official who allowed a crime of dishonest service to go unreported to the council since the police department was involved with allowing the abuse of my son by my ex when I live in another county. I have a right to my opinion since my family and son held by kidnapping and drug overdose to torture and abuse him daily by a pedophile on the lam by the Hatfield's is allowed to extort and fraud my family while she walks away with my family's life earnings converted illegally by the clerk of court in her "hate crime against me" as stated by Mr. Vaughn who was not appointed or paid by the state and due process at that time, since I pay for my attorneys, not those who work for the Hatfield's. Go back to the Rhino Times of May 2006 and see where again Jack Hatfield is involved. I was splattered with prejudicial bias of a case without any due process using the chief judge for an exhorbitant bail bond converted by the clerk of court, David Churchill to the financial gain of Kitty Hatfield that three judges told her she had no jurisdiction to commit such crimes. If an attorney could call a hate crime like Mr. Vaughn, then he is obligated by law to report such violations. The same with Mr. Barber when I went to see my attorney in the same building when he stated hate takes a ride over the truth to corrupt and obstruct justice. Seems he did just that to Trudy and Mary at yesterday's meeting. If you want the truth, go into court and see how the city police department, along with James Fulmore and Brian James are used to cover up and obstruct a fraud investigation. That also includes you chief of police. This case is no longer in the courts but will be dealt with now in a federal case whereby the city and courts, attorneys, DSS, mental health, all have no public doctrine immunity, or absolute immunity for their criminal malicious intents and motives all under the color of law in their actions as officers of the state of NC. What part of what I've said don't you understand? Obviously you are blindsighted by the corruption or you haven't smelled the poop at the bottom of the woodpile that will again surface quickly since you kept the same corrupt leader in place. Mark my words. I have the right to freedom of speech, since my son's life is in danger due to the careless reckless disregard and negligence of the law enforcement within Greensboro and most particularly by Captain Rogers from the Western District. As long as my son's life is allowed to be snuffed away daily, then I have an input to the city that I lived in and have family in. Let my son die because of the corruption, I will charge first degree murder to each and every conspirator. Why not turn this bs over to the attorney general. You can't get justice when the past and present DA's are up to their necks in cow manuer and controlled by the Hatfield's as well. If you haven't been abused by a corrupt police department used by Kitty and Jack, then how do you plan to clean up the drug lording going on? My father was used by Kitty to carry out her crimes as a federal defendant along with the police department from November 2003 to November 2005 after she brought in dirty cop Cuthbertson. The police department needs a clean up with clorox and then complete drug testing. As long as my family and father's life earnings were extorted and converted illegally and paid out to Kitty, and the police department failed to do a fraud investigation whereby federal indictments could come down when reported to internal affairs about Cuthbertson, as well as to Sergeant karen Walters in March 2006, when the case was out of civil court and the crimes had paid out illegally in November 2003 as well as again in Feb. 2006 at the direction of judge Turner, who Cuthbertson obstructed justice in falsifying and altering the warrants as clearly documented. If you are as stupid as Mitch, then you have missed the point about what is going on and will continue as long as he stays on board and the public is left withot the final vote, not Mike Barber. If you don't like the stinch of the truth, then I suggest you try seeking the truth by someone who will confirm my facts. Stay tuned, the time is drawing close for that to happen. I have federal attorneys and a prima facie case this time when I file my federal. If you can't get justice, then you hit the crooks where there pocketbooks are for what they do to hurt others and put the blame of them for their own crimes. Do you get my point?
Posted on February 15, 2008 5:09 PM
Becky, I just removed your last post. I don't want to ban you from the site, but I will if I have to.
Please refrain from any more personal attacks.
Posted on February 15, 2008 5:28 PM
Holden,
Too many clowns, not enough elephants.
Posted on February 16, 2008 1:01 AM
Margaret,
Are you familiar with Rebecca's story?
Anybody gonna cover it?
Posted on February 16, 2008 1:07 AM