Challenge? What Challenge?
As a longtime fan of ACC basketball, I'm all in favor of these early season conference challenges in which the ACC is able to show of to the rest of the nation.
But surely I'm not the only one who's grown a bit tired of this so-called ACC-Big Ten "Challenge." Can we at least get rid of the word "challenge"? The ACC has never lost this matchup and, with a 4-1 lead heading into tonight's games, it looks like the conference will notch yet another win. Yawn. How about "ACC-Big Ten Annual Drubbing"?
So it's time to look for higher - or at least different - mountains to climb. While an ACC-SEC challenge would be great from a fan's perspective, it's doubtful that two leagues with overlapping recruiting areas would find it fruitful. That's the same story with the ACC-Big East Challenge, which is a shame because that's got some ready-made animosity built in. Call it the ACC-Big East Brawl to Settle it All, and give players six fouls, like they did back in the day in the Big East.
So what's left? Probably the Big 12, maybe even the Pac-10. Clearly, travel is not a problem for teams these days.
And to make it fun, let's put something else on the line. Have the winning league gets an extra bid to the NCAA tournament, while the losing league gets one less. Have the tournament selection committee draw up the field, then take out, say, the bottom Big 12 team in the brackets and replace it with the ACC team that didn't quite make it originally.
What do you think? Has the ACC-Big 10 Challenge gone stale? What would be an adequate replacement?