In Tuesday's paper, Dustin Long picked his inaugural class for the new NASCAR Hall of Fame in Charlotte. As part of that we ran a little box asking readers to do the same thing. We've gotten in a handful of responses. The best so far was from David Mielke, an N&R reader who lives in eastern Guilford County.
He makes a convincing case for including Wendell Scott in the NASCAR Hall sooner rather than later or not at all. And Scott is an interesting case:
* Scott should get in because he's a pioneer. He was the first African American to win a Cup race, and he raced in nearly 500 events.
* Scott's stats are, well, not great -- just one win and one pole in 495 Cup/Grand National races. That's not HOF material.
* Scott should get in because he probably would have done better had he driven in a different, more tolerant era or racing series.
* Another pioneer, Jackie Robinson, had good enough numbers to be included regardless of his position in history. Scott, in other words, had his chance and did little with it.
And on and on. See how interesting this Hall of Fame debate can be? Better than Sunday's Vegas race, that's for sure.
Now if you're asking me, sure, Scott deserves entry. I don't think he's part of the first class if the hall goes with 5-7 drivers (which was the premise of Dustin's Tuesday story) -- it's hard to exclude Petty, Earnhardt, Pearson, etc. But Scott should be in the first 15-20 drivers.
David's case for including Wendell Scott after the jump ...