The Iraq dilemma
We haven't been able to have a full Editorial Board discussion yet about the week's Iraq-related developments.
It seems pretty clear to me, though, that reports to Congress by Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker didn't change opinions in Washington. We're still stuck between two views: Get out, whatever the consequences; or, Stay in, whatever the consequences.
What do you think is the right course to take?
Comments (2)
To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.
We should get out of Iraq. At this point we shouldn't care anymore about "winning" this war. Because there is nothing to win and there was no legitimate reason to go to war to begin with. "Winning" for sake of winning is pointless.
America is supposed to be defined by her virtues, not her victories.
Posted on September 19, 2007 10:21 AM
"Because there is nothing to win and there was no legitimate reason to go to war to begin with."
Revisionist history at its best......
Posted on September 19, 2007 2:30 PM