News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Your Voice at the Table

« City Council threats can’t be disregarded | Main | Question of the week (Week of June 8) »

Annexation and water policy

Saturday's No. 2 editorial.

At first glance, the anger of some being annexed by the city of Greensboro might seem justified. Why should property owners with functioning septic systems and wells be forced to hook up to city water and sewer lines?

The cost, which is likely to run into the thousands, could strain the finances of many households. Who wouldn’t feel doubly put upon having to struggle to come up with the money to pay for services that are seen as unnecessary?

From a short-term view, the city’s edict just seems like big government at its worst. But look at it from a long-term perspective and it makes sense why the city wants to get people to stop using wells and septic systems.

Annexed areas are urbanizing — and so they face urban problems, such as pollutants that can contaminate well water. Development can turn a drinkable well into a hazardous one.
Septic systems have their own pollution issues. While well-maintained systems can run for decades without problems, our area’s clay soil has its limits. Great for making pottery, it’s not the best for perking. “Eventually septic systems fail,” says Allan Williams, the city’s water resources director.

With public health a priority, the city mandates that property owners in newly annexed areas connect to city services within five years when both water and sewer are made available to them. (The mandate doesn’t apply if only one service is built.)

To minimize contamination, the city also requires, after connection, that the septic system be cleaned out, crushed and filled in. Wells are disconnected to avoid the possibility that they could be hooked onto the city system. But they still can be used for irrigation.

Mandating water and sewer connections might be best for the public’s welfare, but that doesn’t change the fact that annexation is a bitter pill for many, especially those hurting financially. The city should do what it can — whether it’s ferreting out grants or alerting people of property relief programs, such as the homestead exemption — to make a

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.news-record.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/nradmin/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2105

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.