News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Your Voice at the Table

« Question of the week (July 13) | Main | Short stack »

A blueprint for police

A consultant’s report praises Greensboro’s department but recommends scores of possible improvements. The study should be taken seriously.

Greensboro has a very good Police Department that can do better.

So says a detailed, comprehensive and potentially very valuable study by a public-safety consulting firm presented to the City Council last week.

The headline was the recommendation by Carroll Buracker & Associates Inc. of Harrisonburg, Va., to add 79 positions to the force. But that wasn’t unexpected. Manpower has been a concern for a long time, with budget constraints preventing dramatic increases in personnel. More importantly, the consultants say better organization can make a big difference. More effective utilization of existing resources can begin right away, assuming city leaders agree to implement changes.

Lingering effects of old turmoil

The study team did a thorough job, researching records and statistics, conducting interviews, riding with officers on patrol, analyzing policies and structures, then offering scores of suggestions ranging from hiring some secretaries to changing the patrol shifts that were just put into place last year.

The consultants were keenly aware of past troubles. They noted the department has had five chiefs in the last 10 years and that, “At the time this study was initiated, neither the chief (Tim Bellamy) nor any of the four assistant chiefs had been in their position for one year. ... With such a high turnover in leadership positions, it would be difficult for any police department to sustain consistency and uniformity — two very important factors in a well-managed police agency.” They also reported hearing from officers about racial tensions and divisions, too much involvement by city management, “knee-jerk reactions” by the City Council and the need to restore public respect for the department.

Greensboro’s officers deserve respect, the consultants said, praising the high educational level of the force and the “commitment, honesty and attitudes” of its men and women. “At least 99 percent ... including the current police chief and executive staff, had nothing to do with the prior activities by a few employees that resulted in recent negative publicity.”

Crime on a slight downward path

The study asserted that Greensboro residents are safer from crime than they were in 1995, and that crime rates for 2005, 2006 and 2007 “reflect a slightly downward trend.” The consultants credited the department for a clearance rate higher than the national average but noted a decline in arrests in 2006 and 2007 except for a sharp increase in juvenile arrests last year — for reasons unclear.

Despite the positive findings, Carroll Buracker found plenty of room for improvements. It pronounced the five-days-on, four-off fixed-shift schedule for patrol squads a failure and recommended abolishing it. The system, which was supposed to allocate more manpower at times of greatest need, sometimes does the opposite. Consultants reviewed 2007 workloads and recommended three possible models for staffing patrol services with the goal of meeting demands more efficiently. It said some detectives and higher-ranking officers should be assigned to work at night and on weekends. Reaching high objectives also would require a larger force, especially in light of the city’s growth, they said.

Plenty of ideas for police to ponder

Some observations and recommendations may shake public assumptions: Average response times are slow but are skewed unfavorably by counting calls that shouldn’t be classified as high priorities; there’s no coherent programming for community-oriented policing; the gang unit should be cut in half and the new robbery suppression team should be disbanded, replaced by a tactical squad created to respond to all types of crime problems; the rank of corporal should be eliminated; members of the Police Reserve Corps should be paid and more fully utilized; and some sworn officer positions should be “civilianized.”

Also, officers who take patrol cars home shouldn’t have to pay for the privilege and ought to be allowed limited personal use; and the city should consider putting in place a network of cameras to watch major business and high-crime areas. These measures can stretch manpower and deter crime, the study contended. Some officers spend too much valuable time attending meetings and writing reports without clerical help, the consultants said. Some may be doing the wrong jobs.

The information in this report warrants careful evaluation and, in many instances, appropriate action. Bellamy quickly heeded the recommendation to revamp promotion policies, a wise move.

It’s encouraging that outside experts saw so many positives in Greensboro’s Police Department, but the many proposals for achieving better law enforcement are equally welcome.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.news-record.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/nradmin/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2297

Comments (1)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

D Colin said:

Now
Given:

1)The report says our promotion process is extremely flawed.

2)Bellamy says his is better than the previous methods.

3)The basic theory of evolution.

This all says to me:

Our police chain of command is a mess. We do not select good people and it keeps getting worse.

Well we know that Wray surrounded himself with idiots. They actually recorded each others stupidity.

The present command is a product of this system.
In fact the chief came up through Wray's system

He simply says his method is better because it is transparent.

That statement is ludicrous. Transparency in decisions made by idiots does not improve the decisions.

The incompetent perpetuate themselves.
It is built into the system.

If the city had simply gotten Wray and Hinson to resign. we would still be screwed up but no one would know or care.

Think about it

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.