News-Record.com

The North Carolina Piedmont Triad's top go-to source for News
A service of the News & Record, Greensboro, North Carolina

Home

Your Voice at the Table

« North Carolina owes teachers the full bonuses it promised | Main | Wyndham Championship finds its future in the past »

Downtown’s problem isn’t sidewalk dining

Tuesday's lead editorial.

Greensboro has a situation that many other cities would die for: It has a booming nightlife downtown. Instead of rolling up the carpets after 5, as many downtowns do, the city has rolled them out. And it’s not just the weekends that see the crowds; they’re also there some weeknights.

But now some downtown proprietors are worried that the scene could go bad: Specifically, there’s concern that at 2 or 3 a.m., when the bars close, drunken clubbers could create situations that harm them — and the image of the downtown.

These concerns are valid. Nobody wants the city to be the location for a 100-person fight. But the way some in the city want to address this issue seems misguided: Instead of thinking about posting more officers downtown to keep things in check and to prevent loitering, the focus has been on opposing any increase in sidewalk dining.

Some club owners want to be allowed to serve on public sidewalks during all their opening hours. Now the city limits dining on public sidewalks to 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Sunday-Thursday and from 11 a.m.-midnight on Friday, Saturday and holidays.

Opponents think extending dining hours might be the spark that incites a downtown riot. They say that clubs’ nighttime closings can put several hundred people, many drunk, on the sidewalks simultaneously. The police have all they can do to keep these people moving to their cars now, without having sidewalk furniture as impediments. They also say extending sidewalk cafes’ hours would mean more people for the police to patrol.

We can understand not adding kindling to a possibly explosive situation. But diners aren’t that kindling.

The most logical way to ensure order downtown would be to put more police on patrol there. Of course, that raises an important question: How would the strapped-for-cash city pay for them?
Why not get funds from clubbers? Many of downtown’s nighttime visitors are parking for free in the decks — decks that drivers in the day have to pay to use. If nighttime visitors paid to park, that could raise enough money to pay for more officers.

Also, the issue of extended sidewalk hours doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing proposition. Why not a compromise between the two sides? The city could increase hours for dining but still require clubs to close sidewalk cafes an hour before last call.

Or, the city might even consider allowing bars to stay open until 6 a.m. Most clubbers would leave long before then and their departure would be gradual instead of all at once as happens now. That should help police with crowd control. There are many ways to keep the peace downtown besides targeting sidewalk dining.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.news-record.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/nradmin/managed-mt/mt-tb.cgi/2479

Comments (4)

To report abuse of the comment feature on this site, please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page.

XM said:

Two major problems with your ideas.
1- One of the reasons downtown is thriving is free parking. Simple economics - start charging for parking, and people will stay away. The decks are full during the day because people who work downtown have to be there. After hours, nobody HAS to come downtown.
2- Why would any bar owner pay employees and utilities to stay open until 6 a.m., when he has to stop serving alcohol at 2? Do you really think people will hang around the bars when they can't drink?

XM said:

Two major problems with your ideas.
1- One of the reasons downtown is thriving is free parking. Simple economics - start charging for parking, and people will stay away. The decks are full during the day because people who work downtown have to be there. After hours, nobody HAS to come downtown.
2- Why would any bar owner pay employees and utilities to stay open until 6 a.m., when he has to stop serving alcohol at 2? Do you really think people will hang around the bars when they can't drink?

mick said:

How many folks are actually dining at 10 PM, midnight or 2 AM at these downtown establishments? They just have bar seats outside. Im not against changing some of the restrictions but let's call it what it is. Public consumption for the most part.

News & Record said:

See Sunday's paper for a column by Allen Johnson on this topic ...

Due to recent automated spamming attacks on our blogs, we are temporarily requiring commenters to authenticate themselves via TypeKey® before posting comments to any News & Record blog in order to prevent denials of service. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Post a comment

Users who post comments to this blog tacitly agree to observe the News & Record Online Service Terms of Use and Content Submission Agreement. Comments which do not adhere to the terms of this agreement may be removed and the submitter may be banned from further participation. Please use the feedback form at the bottom of any page to report abuse of this feature.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Search

Search

Channels
Font Size
Tools
Question, Comment or Suggestion? Please contact us.

News & Record and NRinteractive

200 E. Market Street, Greensboro, NC 27401 (336) 373-7000 (800) 553-6880
1813 N. Main Street, High Point, NC 27262 (336) 883-4422
203 E. Harris Place, Eden, NC 27288 (336) 627-1781
4213 S. Church Street, Burlington, NC 27215 (336) 449-7064

Copyright (C) 2008 News & Record and Landmark Communications, Inc.